1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00245287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of coculture of anaerobic fungi isolated from ruminants and non-ruminants with methanogenic bacteria on cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzyme activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alcohol, introduced in the rumen by diets, is known to be only partially (about 20%) transformed to VFA by the rumen microorganisms (Durix et al, 1991) and most alcohol is known to be absorbed through the rumen wall (Burning and Yokoyama, 1988). In the rumen, alcohols also can be synthesized by fungi (Teunissen et al, 1992) and bacteria (Laukova and Marounek, 1992), and production of alcohol is an electron sink in fermentation (Teunissen et al, 1992), in agreement with the observed accumulation of alcohols with high starch intake (Allison et al, 1964). Alcohols are removed from the rumen by microbial metabolism and absorption (Jean-Blain et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Alcohol, introduced in the rumen by diets, is known to be only partially (about 20%) transformed to VFA by the rumen microorganisms (Durix et al, 1991) and most alcohol is known to be absorbed through the rumen wall (Burning and Yokoyama, 1988). In the rumen, alcohols also can be synthesized by fungi (Teunissen et al, 1992) and bacteria (Laukova and Marounek, 1992), and production of alcohol is an electron sink in fermentation (Teunissen et al, 1992), in agreement with the observed accumulation of alcohols with high starch intake (Allison et al, 1964). Alcohols are removed from the rumen by microbial metabolism and absorption (Jean-Blain et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Dehority and coworkers (3,7,11,14) and subsequently others (5,24) demonstrated that cocultures of highly xylanolytic, poor utilizers (cellulolytic species) and weakly xylanolytic, good utilizers (e.g., P. ruminicola) were able to more completely utilize xylan than their respective monocultures (5,14,24). The results of other experiments (19,31,35) suggest that the enhanced rates of xylan utilization displayed by certain cocultures of ruminal microorganisms (e.g., xylanolytic and methanogenic species) may be the result of decreased accumulation of soluble intermediates in these cultures and their influence on the levels of xylanolytic enzymes produced. Williams et al (36) showed that improved xylan utilization resulted from cocultures of the xylan-degrading species of the ruminal fungus Neocallimastix frontalis and the soluble sugarutilizing species S. ruminantium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast to the findings of the above studies, xylan utilization was not enhanced in cocultures of B. fibrisolvens and S. ruminantium. While the removal of potentially inhibitory regulators of enzyme synthesis may stimulate the production of xylanolytic enzymes in certain cases (30)(31)(32), competition for available growth substrate likely also influences the growth, species composition, and enzymatic activities produced in mixed cultures (23). Presumably, a balance between the numbers of polysaccharide-digesting and competing oligosaccharide-utilizing species must arise for a stable fermentation to result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the rumen, however, this metabolic profile shifts due to interspecies hydrogen transfer with physically associated methanogens (Orpin & Joblin, 1997;Voncken et al, 2002), resulting in the energetically favourable disposal of electrons via methanogenesis (Cheng et al, 2009). Enhanced anaerobic fungal enzyme production and fibre dedgradation have been reported to occur as a consequence of this favourable interaction (Bauchop & Mountfort, 1981;Mountfort et al, 1982;Teunissen et al, 1992;Cheng et al, 2009); however, interactions with other rumen microorganism are not always so mutually beneficial (Gordon & Phillips, 1998). Incubation of anaerobic fungi with protozoa inhibits fungal-mediated plant cell wall degradation (Lee et al, 2000a); presumably due to protozoal predation of zoospores and potential damage caused to fungal cell walls by protozoal enzymes (Morgavi et al, 1994;Miltko et al, 2014).…”
Section: Significance For Other Gut Microorganism and The Hostmentioning
confidence: 99%