2017
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714003065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cohesion on local compaction and granulation of sheared soft granular materials

Abstract: Abstract. This paper results from an ongoing investigation of the effect of cohesion on the compaction of sheared soft wet granular materials. We compare dry non-cohesive and wet moderately-to-strongly cohesive soft almost frictionless granular materials and report the effect of cohesion between the grains on the local volume fraction. We study this in a three dimensional, unconfined, slowly sheared split-bottom ring shear cell, where materials while sheared are subject to compression under the confining weigh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The volume fraction increases with increase in confining stress as shown in [27,40]. In ongoing research [34], we show that inter-particle cohesion has a considerable impact on the compaction of the soft materials. Cohesion causes additional stresses, due to capillary forces between particles, leading to an increase in volume fraction due to higher compaction.…”
Section: Rheological Modelsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The volume fraction increases with increase in confining stress as shown in [27,40]. In ongoing research [34], we show that inter-particle cohesion has a considerable impact on the compaction of the soft materials. Cohesion causes additional stresses, due to capillary forces between particles, leading to an increase in volume fraction due to higher compaction.…”
Section: Rheological Modelsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…where b = 0.6 for non-cohesive materials and b < < 0.5 0.7 for cohesive materials are fitted well by our data. Assuming the pressure varying hydrostatically and the bulk density as r r » 0.6 b , we translate equation (34) to W as a function of p. Substituting equations (31) and (34) in (13) and rearranging, we get the inertial number I max in the shear band center as a function of the local pressure p. Further, by substituting p, we get h* max in the shear band center and thus obtain a quantitatively accurate prediction of h* max (I max ), plotted as blue solid lines and cyan dashed lines in figure 10.…”
Section: Analytical Prediction Of Apparent Viscositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The setup used for simulations consists of a shear cell with annular geometry and a split in the bottom plate, as explained in [15,17,18,22,[30][31][32][33][34]. The system consists of an outer cylinder (radius R o = 110 mm) rotating around a fixed inner cylinder (radius R i = 14.7 mm) with a rotation frequency of = 0.19 s −1 .…”
Section: A Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The granular material is confined by gravity between the two concentric cylinders and the bottom plate, with a free top surface. [15,18,22], very few simulations are done using the whole shear cell [35,36].…”
Section: A Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation