1971
DOI: 10.1210/endo-89-2-408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Colchicine onin VitroACTH Release Induced by High K+and by Hypothalamus-Stalk-Median Eminence Extract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Colchicine interferes with the exocytotic secretion of many hormones (Lacy, Howell, Young & Fink, 1968;Kraicer & Milligan, 1971;Douglas & Sorimachi, 1972;Sorimachi, Oesch & Thoenen, 1973) possibly by causing disintegration of microtubules (Borisy & Taylor, 1967). In the present experiments, responses to 5-HT and DMPP, but not those to noradrenaline or tyramine, were inhibited by colchicine (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Colchicine interferes with the exocytotic secretion of many hormones (Lacy, Howell, Young & Fink, 1968;Kraicer & Milligan, 1971;Douglas & Sorimachi, 1972;Sorimachi, Oesch & Thoenen, 1973) possibly by causing disintegration of microtubules (Borisy & Taylor, 1967). In the present experiments, responses to 5-HT and DMPP, but not those to noradrenaline or tyramine, were inhibited by colchicine (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Lacy, Howell, Young & Fink (1968) suggested that microtubules, or like elements, may be involved in secretion of insulin by emiocytosis (exocytosis) and supported their concept with evidence that colchicine, a drug whose disrupting actions on microtubules is well documented (Borisy & Taylor, 1967), depressed the output of insulin from pancreatic /3-cells stimulated, in vitro, with glucose (see also MalaisseLagae, Greider, Malaisse & Lacy, 1971). Experiments on other secretory cells, stimulated by various means, have not always revealed such sensitivity to colchicine (Kraicer & Milligan, 1971;Schofield & Cole, 1971), but where significant inhibition has been observed this has generally been considered as support for the involvement of microtubules or related elements (Gillespie, Levine & Malawista, 1968;Kraicer & Milligan, 1971;Levy & Carlton, 1971;Schofield & Cole, 1971 (1961) as modified by Sorimachi (1968). Catecholamines were assayed by the fluorometric method according to Anton & Sayre (1962).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Lacy et al suggested that the microtubular system in the islet cells of the pancreas probably plays an important role in the secretion of insulin from these cells (2), several in vitro experiments have been carried out on the pituitary, thyroid and adrenal glands concerning the influence of colchicine and other antimicrotubular agents on endocrine functions (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). A consensus of opinion, however, has never been reached, and few in vivo experiments clarifying the effect of colchicine and other antimicrotubular agents on adrenocortical function have been documented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%