2002
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2002.167.173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Commercial Enzyme (Natugrain) Supplementation on the Nutritive Value and Inclusion Rate of Guar Meal in Broiler Rations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the differences between the two treatments were insignificant on the contrary, gizzard and giblets percentages figures showed significant differences between treatments, in which control group reflected the lowest figures compared with other dietary treatments T1-4 and the corresponding figures being 1.16 and 3.79%, while chickens fed T4 diet (100% GM) gave the highest figures, being 1.79 and 5.23, respectively, and the differences between treatments were significant. Similar observation was reported by other investigators, Muhammad et al (2002), Lee et al (2005), El-Faham et al (2017 and Khalifa et al (2017), they reported that adding GM to broiler diets had no significant effects on carcass treats. The et al Tammam obtained data are in disagreement with those reported by Kamaran et al (2002) and Mohayayee (2011) who showed that inclusion of GM in broiler chickens rations reflected a negative effect on carcass dressing%.…”
Section: Carcass Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Besides, the differences between the two treatments were insignificant on the contrary, gizzard and giblets percentages figures showed significant differences between treatments, in which control group reflected the lowest figures compared with other dietary treatments T1-4 and the corresponding figures being 1.16 and 3.79%, while chickens fed T4 diet (100% GM) gave the highest figures, being 1.79 and 5.23, respectively, and the differences between treatments were significant. Similar observation was reported by other investigators, Muhammad et al (2002), Lee et al (2005), El-Faham et al (2017 and Khalifa et al (2017), they reported that adding GM to broiler diets had no significant effects on carcass treats. The et al Tammam obtained data are in disagreement with those reported by Kamaran et al (2002) and Mohayayee (2011) who showed that inclusion of GM in broiler chickens rations reflected a negative effect on carcass dressing%.…”
Section: Carcass Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The economic value of guar meal can be regarded as a 'salvage' market (Conner, 2002). Although less palatable and potentially toxic, guar meal has a great potential as an alternative protein source for livestock and poultry, because of its high levels (nearly 59 to 60% crude protein (CP)) and less expensive (Couch et al, 1967;Humphrey et al, 2018;Kamran et al, 2002;Lee et al, 2005). Guar meal meets the criteria defined by Kim et al (2017) to be considered as an alternative feedstuff; however, it has not yet been adopted in the NRC (2012) database for swine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%