2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of comorbidity on injury outcomes: a review of existing indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study demonstrated the variation in associations between comorbidity and outcomes, depending on the outcome measure, confirming suggestions from previous studies which recommended study- and outcome-specific comorbidity indices [ 35 39 ]. These indices were derived using a population-based database; the indices are current and can be used for general injury patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This study demonstrated the variation in associations between comorbidity and outcomes, depending on the outcome measure, confirming suggestions from previous studies which recommended study- and outcome-specific comorbidity indices [ 35 39 ]. These indices were derived using a population-based database; the indices are current and can be used for general injury patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Other studies have also found similar AUROC values for ASA classification (0.584, 95% CI 0.578-0.589), mCCI (0.567, 95% CI 0.561-0.573), and mFI (0.534, 95% CI 0.529-0.539). 9 , 10 , 20 , 21 In this data set, the mean complication rate was 18.6%. In our data set, there was a stepwise increase in complication rate with increasing CRS ( Table IV ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This demonstrates a similar discriminative ability to the most common comorbidity indices currently utilized, including ASA, mCCI, and mFI. 9 , 10 , 20 , 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of comorbidities for each enrollee was calculated using the Elixhauser Index for adults (ages 18–64) and the Pediatric Complex Chronic Conditions Classification System for children (ages 0–17) [ 10 , 11 ]. Both indices have been used to identify preexisting conditions among large administrative data sources [ 12–17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%