2012
DOI: 10.12989/sem.2012.42.1.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of compressible membrane's nonlinear stress-strain behavior on spiral case structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 2012 several papers of the Chinese scientist appeared devoted on the raising deformation incident in Xiluodu (China) hydropower stations [33] and analysis of compressible membranes around the spiral cases of Francis turbines [34,35]. In the period to 2018 different methods of embedment of Francis turbines are investigated.…”
Section: Spiral Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After 2012 several papers of the Chinese scientist appeared devoted on the raising deformation incident in Xiluodu (China) hydropower stations [33] and analysis of compressible membranes around the spiral cases of Francis turbines [34,35]. In the period to 2018 different methods of embedment of Francis turbines are investigated.…”
Section: Spiral Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the period to 2018 different methods of embedment of Francis turbines are investigated. Zhang and Wu [34][35][36][37][38], Wu et al [39] performed numerical structural analysis of the Francis turbine embedment including preloaded filling spiral case with non-uniform gap. They considered the sliding behavior of the steel on surrounding concrete, using softened contact of the compressible membrane, etc.…”
Section: Spiral Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the authors' previous work, structural analysis of SCS can be roughly considered as an axisymmetric problem [8,24,25]. Meanwhile, considering the mechanical behavior of SCS, the mesh size of the SSC is the key dominant factor that decides whether the mesh can yield a proper response of the FEA.…”
Section: Validation Of the Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the present rate of hydropower development, the global energy pathway to net zero emissions will not be realized [6]. Considering that M-type SCSs do not need pressurization equipment in the construction period, it is believed that they can simplify the construction procedure and help reduce the span of the powerhouse [7][8][9]. Accordingly, several attempts have been made to install M-type SCSs in high head HPPs, such as all five SCSs in the Lijiaxia HPP and nine out of thirty-two SCSs in the Three Gorges HPP [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%