1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0965-9773(98)00047-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of concentration gradients on nanostructure development during primary crystallization of soft-magnetic iron-based amorphous alloys and its modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the blocking of the growth of the nanocrystals can be ascribed to the pile up of atoms non-soluble in -Fe grains and with a very slow diffusivity in the amorphous matrix [18], Nb in the studied alloy. [19].…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In fact, the blocking of the growth of the nanocrystals can be ascribed to the pile up of atoms non-soluble in -Fe grains and with a very slow diffusivity in the amorphous matrix [18], Nb in the studied alloy. [19].…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The emphasis will be on models for precipitation, devitrivication, and recrystallisation reactions which have either been recently derived or have recently attracted increased attention, and which have been reported to be able to deal with deviations from JMAK kinetics. The model by Woldt 200 considers recrystallisation, the models by Yavari and Negri 174 and Gangopadhyay et al 201 consider nanocrystallisation during devitrivication, Kelton's model 202,203 considers transformations that involve coupled fluxes of interfacial attachment and long-range diffusion, the mean field model considers precipitation, and the work by Starink and Zahra 170 describes a kinetic equation that can be valid for a range of reaction types.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amorphous and nanocrystalline total intensity contributions, shown in Fig. 2 (a) were obtained by deconvolution [10] of the first amorphous halo and the two most intense ((111) and (200)) fcc-Al peaks after background subtraction. The Lorentzian function fits were chosen for matching both amorphous halo and broadened fcc-Al peaks according to the best agreement with experimental data.…”
Section: Methods Assumptions and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent activation energies of the second crystallization stage are in the range from 11100 to 43900 K ( Table 5. For better understanding of kinetics of the second crystallization stage the samples of two amorphous alloys Al 90 Y 10 and Al 86 Ni 6 Co 2 Gd 6 have been annealed at temperatures somewhat lower then T ons2 to observe two crystallization stages in one experiment. As can be seen in Fig.…”
Section: Activity 23 Determination Of the Parameters Of Nanocompositmentioning
confidence: 99%