2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01053.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of conditioning horses every third day at v10 on measures of fitness

Abstract: This study examined the effect of exercising horses five times per fortnight with two bouts of 5 min duration at their v(10) with 2 days between consecutive exercise sessions. Five Anglo-Arabian horses were treadmill-conditioned for 6 weeks. A standardized exercise test (SET) was performed at the beginning of the conditioning period (CP) to determine the blood lactate-running speed (BLRS) and the heart rate-running speed (HRRS) relationship and the SET was repeated every 2 weeks. After each SET, the BLRS relat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evans and Rose [ 36 ] showed no change in exercise HR response during 7 weeks of training at mean velocities of 4–8.3 m/s and Lindner et al . [ 45 ] did not find any improvement in the velocity at HR 180 bpm in horses trained at a blood lactate concentration of 10 mmol/L for 6 weeks, in detrained and untrained horses. In the present study, horses had been in training for 6 months prior to the first test and a more marked HR reduction could probably not be expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Evans and Rose [ 36 ] showed no change in exercise HR response during 7 weeks of training at mean velocities of 4–8.3 m/s and Lindner et al . [ 45 ] did not find any improvement in the velocity at HR 180 bpm in horses trained at a blood lactate concentration of 10 mmol/L for 6 weeks, in detrained and untrained horses. In the present study, horses had been in training for 6 months prior to the first test and a more marked HR reduction could probably not be expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%