2012
DOI: 10.1007/s40069-012-0010-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Constitutive Material Models on Seismic Response of Two-Story Reinforced Concrete Frame

Abstract: This paper focuses on the finite element (FE) response sensitivity and reliability analyses considering smooth constitutive material models. A reinforced concrete frame is modeled for FE sensitivity analysis followed by direct differentiation method under both static and dynamic load cases. Later, the reliability analysis is performed to predict the seismic behavior of the frame. Displacement sensitivity discontinuities are observed along the pseudo-time axis using non-smooth concrete and reinforcing steel mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The external load is applied to the two mutually orthogonal sides of the model through absolutely rigid plate elements, which are connected to the model by means of flexible rods to avoid an uneven load distribution between the model elements. The hypothesis of flat sections and the appearance of transverse shear strains were fulfilled [17][18][19]. Rigid elements are given flexural rigidity 10 times greater than the rigidity of steel rods: Е=2·106 MPa; ν=3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external load is applied to the two mutually orthogonal sides of the model through absolutely rigid plate elements, which are connected to the model by means of flexible rods to avoid an uneven load distribution between the model elements. The hypothesis of flat sections and the appearance of transverse shear strains were fulfilled [17][18][19]. Rigid elements are given flexural rigidity 10 times greater than the rigidity of steel rods: Е=2·106 MPa; ν=3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%