2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of contact surface area on frictional behaviour of dry and saturated rock joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the temperature condition is controlled by a temperature control system, where a thermocouple is used to control and measure the sample's temperature during laboratory test. By using an automatic coring machine [26], the standard cylindrical samples with a diameter of 50 mm and a height of 100 mm are taken from the core of a large rock block located at the depth about 862 meters. Therefore, the samples can be considered to be initially saturated/quasisaturated and possess the same characteristics of material.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the temperature condition is controlled by a temperature control system, where a thermocouple is used to control and measure the sample's temperature during laboratory test. By using an automatic coring machine [26], the standard cylindrical samples with a diameter of 50 mm and a height of 100 mm are taken from the core of a large rock block located at the depth about 862 meters. Therefore, the samples can be considered to be initially saturated/quasisaturated and possess the same characteristics of material.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of dilation and compression on hydro-mechanical behaviour of rock discontinuities are of significant importance in various geotechnical applications such as hydraulic fracturing design, earthquake and seismic analysis, dams and slope stability analysis, CO 2 geo-sequestration operations, contaminant transport modelling, and disposal of nuclear wastes, amongst others (Pirzada et al 2020;Rutqvist and Stephansson 2003;Tsang 1991). A great number of studies have been conducted to understand the hydro-mechanical behaviour of rock joints (Berkowitz 2002;Pirzada et al 2018;Pyrak-Nolte et al 1987;Zimmerman and Bodvarsson 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, water flow or fluid flow in general may change along joints, cleavages or fractures (Köppel et al 2019); or fluid flow may generate even new cracks (Mentes 2019). A number parameters of any rock joint can affect shear resistance to a great degree: water content, the filler material between the sides of a joint, exposure to weather (Barton 1973(Barton , 1976Miščević and Vlastelica 2009), length of joint (Barton and Bandis 1982), surface roughness (Barton 1973;Haberfield and Seidel 1999;Grasselli and Egger 2003;Lee et al 2014), the morphology of surface asperities (Patton 1966;Yang et al 2016;Niktabar et al 2017), the dilation angle (Barton 1973;Kumar and Verma 2016), the contact surface (Zhao 1997;Grasselli and Egger 2003;Pirzada et al 2020), inclination of the joint (Buocz et al 2017), and the compressive strength of the joint (Barton 1973; Barton and Choubey 1977;Lee et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buocz et al (2017) also adopted a bilinear criterion for the study of the effect of discontinuity inclination on Opalinus Claystone samples. Pirzada et al (2020) applied an M-C failure criterion based on the results of different natural rock types with different normal strengths (σ c 6.3-143.2 MPa) and artificial rock samples (σ c 27.0 MPa). Tests were performed at σ n 0.5-3.0 MPa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%