1997
DOI: 10.1007/s003740050264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of continuous and alternate water regimes on methane efflux from rice under greenhouse conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Field observations indicated that CH 4 emissions were reduced in the intermittent irrigation system compared with the continuous flooding paddies [Yang and Chang, 2001]. A pot experiment with different courses of periodic drainage indicated the reduction factor was about 45% to 72% [Mishra et al, 1997]. Cai [1997] suggested that midseason aeration could mitigate CH 4 emissions by as much as 50%.…”
Section: Seasonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field observations indicated that CH 4 emissions were reduced in the intermittent irrigation system compared with the continuous flooding paddies [Yang and Chang, 2001]. A pot experiment with different courses of periodic drainage indicated the reduction factor was about 45% to 72% [Mishra et al, 1997]. Cai [1997] suggested that midseason aeration could mitigate CH 4 emissions by as much as 50%.…”
Section: Seasonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies from India indicated that intermittent flooding could remarkably reduce the seasonal methane emissions (22-88%) without any loss in rice yield [22]. Rice plant characteristics have a strong impact on methane emissions and a negligible to substantial differences (up to 56%) in the rate between different cultivars were recorded [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from subtropical Japanese rice fields. Kudo et al [87] The first measurements of CH 4 emission from paddy fields were conducted in California by Cicerone and Shetter [28].This was followed by extensive studies in Spain [138], China [26], USA [133], Japan [157], Philippines [115], and India [110,139] [136]. These field experiments varied widely in the methodologies (closed chamber with automatic or manual sampling devices), sampling frequencies (continuous or sporadic sampling), observation periods (one season or several consecutive years) and sampling field designs (randomized plots or single fields).…”
Section: Methanogenic Population and Ch 4 Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%