2007
DOI: 10.1021/jp073481i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Copolymer Architecture on the Micellization and Gelation of Aqueous Solutions of Copolymers of Ethylene Oxide and Styrene Oxide

Abstract: The micellar properties and solubilization capacity of poorly water soluble drugs of several micellar and gel solutions of diblock and triblock copolymers of styrene oxide/ethylene oxide have been measured and compared with block copolymers of butylene oxide/ethylene oxide, showing that the solubilization capacity of the styrene oxide block is approximately four times that of a butylenes oxide block for dilute solutions. To continue establishing the correlation between micellar characteristics and solubilizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The easiest gel formation by the diblock copolymers was attributed to more stable micelles formed by these due to the low micellisation enthalpy. 63 In another study AB, ABA as well as a BAB copolymer were compared, based on EO and BO and the results were similar to the above with the two triblocks not forming a gel while the AB diblock copolymer did. 65 In a study by the same authors using the same monomers but by increasing the hydrophobic content gelation was achieved by the triblock copolymers too however the CGC increased from the diblock to the ABA triblock to the BAB; indicating once again the easier gelation of the diblock compared to the corresponding triblock copolymers.…”
Section: Diblock Vs Triblock Copolymerssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The easiest gel formation by the diblock copolymers was attributed to more stable micelles formed by these due to the low micellisation enthalpy. 63 In another study AB, ABA as well as a BAB copolymer were compared, based on EO and BO and the results were similar to the above with the two triblocks not forming a gel while the AB diblock copolymer did. 65 In a study by the same authors using the same monomers but by increasing the hydrophobic content gelation was achieved by the triblock copolymers too however the CGC increased from the diblock to the ABA triblock to the BAB; indicating once again the easier gelation of the diblock compared to the corresponding triblock copolymers.…”
Section: Diblock Vs Triblock Copolymerssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…63,64 The polymers in the first study were based on EO and styrene oxide (SO), 63 and in the second study on EO and BO 64 with the hydrophobic monomers SO and BO being always the B block. The easiest gel formation by the diblock copolymers was attributed to more stable micelles formed by these due to the low micellisation enthalpy.…”
Section: Diblock Vs Triblock Copolymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After getting the surface tension data for about thirty dilutions for each copolymer solution at a given temperature, the plots of surface tension (γ) versus logC (where C is the concentration of copolymers the in g·dm -3 ) were used for estimation of the critical micelle concentration, CMC of the polymer. The CMC, was assigned to the concentration at and above which the surface tension remain constant [3,21,[26][27][28].…”
Section: Surface Tension Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative magnitude of these two opposing effects, therefore, determines whether the CMC increases or decreases over a particular temperature range [27]. In most cases of nonionic surfactants, increase in temperature favour micellization and aggregation process while opposite situation can be seen in case of ionic amphiphiles because the solubility of ionic surfactant enhances at higher temperature and repulsion between the ionic head groups may occur [4,7,16,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. In case of PEO-PBO block copolymers, it is expected that higher is the content of hydro- 19 at a given temperature ( Table 2).…”
Section: Viscosity and Density Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome some of these limitations, more hydrophobic block copolymer counterparts with similar architecture, but with the PPO segment replaced by a more hydrophobic one, such as poly(butylene oxide) (PBO), poly(styrene oxide) (PSO) or phenylglycidyl ether (PG), have been developed by the Attwood and Booth's group in collaboration with us during last years [17][18][19][20][21]. Polystyrene oxide-based block copolymers are of particular interest due to (i) their ability to self-assemble at very low concentrations into micelles with improved solubilization ability and stability [22,23] and (ii) the low glass transition temperatures (ca.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%