2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of corn grain variety on the bioethanol production efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Determining the most appropriate variety and harvest time of cassava is also essential for the ethanol production industry. There have been many reports about the effect of the feedstock variety and harvest time on the yield and efficiency of ethanol production, such as sugarcane , corn , sorghum , and sweet potato . However, our understanding of the effect of the cassava variety and harvest time on the properties that are relevant to their industrial applications is still limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the most appropriate variety and harvest time of cassava is also essential for the ethanol production industry. There have been many reports about the effect of the feedstock variety and harvest time on the yield and efficiency of ethanol production, such as sugarcane , corn , sorghum , and sweet potato . However, our understanding of the effect of the cassava variety and harvest time on the properties that are relevant to their industrial applications is still limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it was slightly higher when compared with the results of a study by Sivamani et al [30], where they used cassava peel and ethanol yield was 83% of the theoretical ethanol yield. The same is true when the result is compared with the study by Gumienna et al [22] where the outcome of each was 81.33%. 44 U/mL and 74.87 spm, respectively.…”
Section: Ethanol Production From Manihot Glazioviimentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The results of reducing in this study are similar to a study by Naguleswaran et al [25], with corn and triticale (80.8%-84.5%) as a feedstock, but slightly lower than that of wheat (90.8%-95.1%). Gumienna et al [22] also conduct the enzyme hydrolysis for corn starch and obtained reducing sugar of 11.7 g/L (69.40%). Moreover, Tasić et al [24] performed acid hydrolysis on potato and produced a 114 g/L (64%) concentration of reducing sugar.…”
Section: Relationship Between the Independent Variables Of The Starchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to find the 'best' number of clusters, v-fold cross validation was performed (Janisová et al 2014;Flanagan & Cerrato 2015;Gumienna et al 2016). The benefit of v-fold cross validation is that the number of clusters will be determined from the data and must not be known a priori which means prior knowledge about the number of clusters is not essential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%