2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04451-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of correlated random fields on nonlinear dynamic responses of gravity dam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the distribution of cavitation bubbles in the micro-area of is assumed to be uniform. These assumptions are widely used in the discretization and simulation of material and loading random fields of civil engineering [38] , [39] , so the assumptions mentioned above are reasonable.
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the distribution of cavitation bubbles in the micro-area of is assumed to be uniform. These assumptions are widely used in the discretization and simulation of material and loading random fields of civil engineering [38] , [39] , so the assumptions mentioned above are reasonable.
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some researchers have paid special attention to the spatial variability of dam and foundation materials. Lu et al [23] and Li et al [24] determined the influence laws of concrete material parameters on the dynamic response characteristics of gravity dams based on the aspects of damage area distribution, crack length statistics, displacement in the crest, energy dissipation, and parameter sensitivity. Chi et al [25] performed a stochastic analysis of seepage using three types of random fields, and the application showed that the spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity induces differences using different random fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the seismic design and research of high concrete dams, we should break through some traditional concepts and methods that are difficult to reflect reality. For example, in the seismic analysis of traditional high concrete dams, the foundation rock mass is mostly used as linear elastic materials or DP elastoplastic models are used (Ansari et al 2016;Sadeghi et al 2020;Li et al 2021). But the simulation cannot accurately reflect the nonlinear performance and stress redistribution phenomenon of rock when subjected to external loads that exceed their tensile and compressive strength (Guo et al 2020;Zhang et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%