2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of corrosion of reinforcement on the mechanical behaviour of highly corroded RC beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of various experiments performed by François (2014, 2015) and Zhu et al (2013) showed that about 1% loss in cross-sectional area of longitudinal reinforcement leads to about 1% decrease in relative yield strength and 0.85% reduction in ultimate capacity. However, this was found to be the result of the concrete crushing.…”
Section: Driftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of various experiments performed by François (2014, 2015) and Zhu et al (2013) showed that about 1% loss in cross-sectional area of longitudinal reinforcement leads to about 1% decrease in relative yield strength and 0.85% reduction in ultimate capacity. However, this was found to be the result of the concrete crushing.…”
Section: Driftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam considered in this paper belongs to Group B. Detailed information on the corroded beams is available in previous papers about this programme (Vidal, Castel, & Franc ois, 2007;Zhang, Castel, & Franc ois, 2009;Zhu, Franc ois, Coronelli, & Cleland, 2013), thus, only a very short introduction will be presented in the sequence. The non-corroded beams were treated as control beams (non-corroded beams), which were cast at the same time and kept under the same service load but not stored in the chloride environment.…”
Section: Description Of the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the accurate corrosion rate of the reinforcements embedded in the corroded RC column, the specimen was further broken down and the reinforcement cage in it was taken out after the bearing capacity test. According to the standard ASTM G1-03, the corrosion products were thereafter removed by mechanical and chemical cleaning, the mass of each corroded reinforcement was weighed, and the actual corrosion rate generally defined as the weight loss percentage of the original state was calculated per Equation (3) [45], where ∆m is the weight loss, and m i and m f are the mass of the reinforcement before and after corrosion, respectively:…”
Section: Corrosion Of Reinforcementsmentioning
confidence: 99%