2020
DOI: 10.17811/ebl.9.1.2020.41-47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of corruption on firm level innovation: Evidence from Pakistan

Abstract: Corruption is a widespread phenomenon in majority of the developing countries. However, literature evident both positive and negative impact of corruption in economises at macro level. At the micro level the studies rarely exist explaining this phenomenon. This paper empirically investigates the micro level impact of corruption on firms’ innovation. For the purpose, we use “percent of firms expected to give gifts to public officials (to get things done)” as a proxy for corruption, and innovation is measured by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
6
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the 2019 findings show a more substantial negative impact of GIL on the efficiency of the non-exporting firms compared to the exporting ones. The GIL evidence is consistent with the findings of Lee and Weng (2013) and Imran et al (2019). Also, the EAS influence is generally more decisive for exporting relative to the non-exporting companies.…”
Section: Export Effects In the Efficiency Of Firms In Middle-income E...supporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the 2019 findings show a more substantial negative impact of GIL on the efficiency of the non-exporting firms compared to the exporting ones. The GIL evidence is consistent with the findings of Lee and Weng (2013) and Imran et al (2019). Also, the EAS influence is generally more decisive for exporting relative to the non-exporting companies.…”
Section: Export Effects In the Efficiency Of Firms In Middle-income E...supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Firms may engage external auditors to satisfy regulatory requirements or outside investors but not necessarily to improve their internal structures and performance. The negative EEAS effect appears inconsistent with Imran et al . (2019) and Jusoh and Ahmad's (2013) evidence.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…The negative CIND and CBREQ effects corroborate the findings of Sahakyan and Stiegert (2012) and Phan and Archer (2020). Also, the positive CIND and CBREQ influence agrees with Li and Liu's (2015) and Imran et al .’s (2019) evidence.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It has been argued that corruption can induce competition, efficiency, and innovation among firms or in countries where institutions are ineffective. In other words, corruption “ greases the wheels ” (see, Dreher & Gassebner, 2013; Imran, Rehman, & Khan, 2020; Leff, 1964; Mendoza, Lim, & Lopez, 2015). Although the above is still subject to debate, it is beyond the focus of our study.…”
Section: Brief Review Of Literature On Ownership Structure Corruption and Firm Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%