2000
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of counselling mothers on their children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
114
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
114
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This explains the high concentration values in the frequency distribution of the children from ''nonsmoking'' households ( Figure 1). This discrepancy between parents' report of their children's ETS exposure and the actual ETS exposure, as for example assessed by urinary cotinine levels, was also found in a recent intervention study (Hovell et al, 2000). Mothers' reports of their children's exposure to their smoking declined in a group that was counselled for over 3 months to reduce their children's ETS exposure from 27.3 (baseline) to 4.47 (after 3 months) and 3.66 cigarettes/week (after 12 months).…”
Section: Etsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This explains the high concentration values in the frequency distribution of the children from ''nonsmoking'' households ( Figure 1). This discrepancy between parents' report of their children's ETS exposure and the actual ETS exposure, as for example assessed by urinary cotinine levels, was also found in a recent intervention study (Hovell et al, 2000). Mothers' reports of their children's exposure to their smoking declined in a group that was counselled for over 3 months to reduce their children's ETS exposure from 27.3 (baseline) to 4.47 (after 3 months) and 3.66 cigarettes/week (after 12 months).…”
Section: Etsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In contrast to this, the urinary cotinine levels of the children from counselled mothers were 10.93 (baseline), 12.65 (after 3 months), and 10.47 ng/ml (after 12 months). The corresponding cotinine levels of the children from the control mothers were 9.43, 13.88 and 17.47 ng/ml (Hovell et al, 2000). We decided not to restrict the analysis to the subgroup of children with home visits where we could clean up the data, because this would mean restricting the analysis to a biased subgroup.…”
Section: Etsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such trials are important in the context of the studies successfully completed in the last 20 years showing that SHS exposure can be reduced when families are coached to do so (Hovell et al, 1994(Hovell et al, , 2000(Hovell et al, , 2002(Hovell et al, , 2009Klepeis et al, 2013;Meltzer, Hovell, Meltzer, Atkins, & de Peyster, 1993).…”
Section: Continuedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Only from 1 of those studies was a sustained reduction in exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, measured as cotinine levels, reported, and from another study a significant reduction in the number of unscheduled asthma visits was reported. 12,13 Collectively, these trials raise serious questions about whether it is prudent to continue to rely on anticipatory guidance to reduce children's exposure to tobacco smoke. Our failure to show a reduction in the gaseous phase of children's exposure to SHS by using a passive environmental intervention provides additional support for regulations to ban smoking in public places and residential settings to reduce children's exposure to tobacco smoke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Numerous studies have tested the efficacy of anticipatory guidance to reduce SHS exposure for children, but the majority failed to show significant reductions in children's SHS exposure by using measurements of cotinine, a metabolite of nicotine, or improvements in asthma symptoms. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] This problem might be overcome if there was a technology to reduce SHS exposure passively, such as highefficiency, particulate-arresting (HEPA) air cleaners.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%