Effect of COVID-19 on Pet Food Bank Servicing: Quantifying Numbers of Clients Serviced in the Vancouver Downtown Eastside, British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

Previous research has focused on the benefits and difficulties of pet ownership in people, who are experiencing homelessness. However, many pet services, such as pet food banks, serve a more varied population of people. Furthermore, the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic has not been documented within the context of pet food banks. Vancouver's Downtown Eastside (DTES) population comprises a notable proportion of the city's overall population and has a high density of people who are experiencing financial hardships, but some of whom do not always experience homelessness. The purpose of this study was to gain an understanding of the number of clients and pets that are being serviced by a pet food bank, whether that has changed over time, and if it was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed available attendance and service records from The British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals pet food bank between 2013 and 2020. We found that a median of 100 clients attended the food bank each week and that most of the companion animals serviced were cats (72.5%), then followed by dogs (25.2%), and rats (1.2%). Servicing was not consistent over time, with a weekly pattern of decreased attendance every fourth week of the month, which coincided with income assistance payments. This suggests that either servicing needs are decreased with income assistance or that the week of the month may present an access to care challenge. We also observed a decrease in the clientele attending in 2020 compared to previous years, suggesting an effect of COVID-19. Specifically, this trend was present for cats, rats, rabbits, and “other” companion animals, but not for dogs; the number of dog owners receiving services did not change in 2020, suggesting a difference between needed services in dog vs. other pet owners. The yearly trends shed light on the impact of COVID-19 on vulnerable populations, highlighting the need for additional support through times of crisis. Overall, the data show a complex relationship between pet service provision and other community issues and highlight the need to consider pet food banks within the greater social services networks.

Physical health caregiver, mental wellness supporter, and overall well-being advocate: Women's roles towards animal welfare during the COVID-19 emergency response

“…COVID-19, on the one hand, separated society through social isolation and distancing; on the other hand, it united communities through caring, affection, sympathy, and solidarity [ 47 ]. COVID-19-triggered economic challenges not only impacted individual capacity to access veterinary services but also cut community-based service agency budgets, particularly not-for-profit organizations, which provide vulnerable animals and people with material and financial support [ 80 ]. As COVID-19 shaped their lives, women's gendered caretaking roles moved beyond family and friend circles into the broader community.…”

Trends in Intake and Outcome Data From U.S. Animal Shelters From 2016 to 2020

“…Many organizations also embraced a “community-supported sheltering” model during the COVID-19 pandemic and created new programs or increased the availability of existing programs that proactively address the most common reasons for shelter intake (e.g., housing insecurity, access to veterinary care, and access to pet food and supplies). Examples of these programs include pet food and supply banks ( 20 ), advocating for pet-friendly rental policies ( 21 ), shifting animal control operations from a punishment to support model ( 22 ), offering co-sheltering options for individuals in crisis (e.g., individuals experiencing homelessness or domestic violence) ( 23 ), One Health vaccine clinics ( 24 ), and examining how social and economic inequities affect shelter intake ( 25 , 26 ). There are a number of other emerging program areas that may also be contributing to the measured decreases in total intake throughout the study period, including low- or no-cost spay–neuter services and other preventive veterinary care ( 27 , 28 ); door-to-door outreach in underserved communities to overcome barriers in access to veterinary care ( 29 ), trap-neuter-return ( 30 – 32 ), and return-to-field programs ( 33 , 34 ).…”

COVID-19 and financial performance: Pre and post effect of COVID-19 on organization performance; A study based on South Asian economy

“…Therefore, I have selected the services sector to learn about the effect of COVID-19. Erden and Aslan ( 17 ) concluded that banks are included in the services sector that has been impacted by the pandemic ( 18 ). The term “bank” appears for the first time in history in Italy.…”