2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Crop Geometry and Foliar Nutrition on Growth and Yield of Irrigated Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
12
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in these yield attributes at wider spacing was due to better crop growth, more space available for plants, lesser competition for moisture and nutrients between plants. This result is corroborating with the findings of Chaniyara et al (2002) and Rajeshkumar et al (2017). Growing the crop at 30 × 10 cm spacing resulted in 28 and 24% higher pod yield over the closer spacing of 25×10 cm and 20×10 cm, respectively.…”
Section: Yield Attributes and Yieldsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The increase in these yield attributes at wider spacing was due to better crop growth, more space available for plants, lesser competition for moisture and nutrients between plants. This result is corroborating with the findings of Chaniyara et al (2002) and Rajeshkumar et al (2017). Growing the crop at 30 × 10 cm spacing resulted in 28 and 24% higher pod yield over the closer spacing of 25×10 cm and 20×10 cm, respectively.…”
Section: Yield Attributes and Yieldsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This resulted in efficient nutrient translocation from source to sink. These results fall similar to the findings of Kunjammal and Sukumar [9], Kiruthika et al [10] and Rajeshkumar et al [11], who could find improved yield attributes due to the application of crop boosters [12][13][14].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This may be attributed for the increased plant height and reduced total number of productive branches in high density planting. These results are in agreement with Joshi et al(2019), Rajeshkumar et al (2017), Murad et al (2014, Kumar and Badiyala (2005).…”
Section: Yield Parameterssupporting
confidence: 92%