1957
DOI: 10.1097/00010694-195703000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Crop Residues and Nitrogen Additions on Decomposition of an Ohio Muck Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased litter fall can lead to a number of effects on soil processes, including changes in microbial processes, decomposition rate and nitrogen mineralization (Stotzky & Mortensen, 1957 ;Berendse, 1990 ;Singh, 1995), leading to further increases in nitrogen availability ; any effects on these processes are likely to be accelerated by the increased tissue nitrogen concentrations in litter from the treated plots (Vinton & Burke, 1995 ;Fisk & Schmidt, 1996). The total litter weight values given here might therefore represent an underestimate of the increase in litter fall due to nitrogen treatment over the full period of the study.…”
Section: Litter Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased litter fall can lead to a number of effects on soil processes, including changes in microbial processes, decomposition rate and nitrogen mineralization (Stotzky & Mortensen, 1957 ;Berendse, 1990 ;Singh, 1995), leading to further increases in nitrogen availability ; any effects on these processes are likely to be accelerated by the increased tissue nitrogen concentrations in litter from the treated plots (Vinton & Burke, 1995 ;Fisk & Schmidt, 1996). The total litter weight values given here might therefore represent an underestimate of the increase in litter fall due to nitrogen treatment over the full period of the study.…”
Section: Litter Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of evolved CO 2 from powdered liquorice root refuse of Rishmak, Zarghan, and Shirin-Daroo factories, wheat straw and alfalfa were 51.91, 52.27, 51.70, 55.17, and 63.39 mg (20 g) 21 of soil, respectively ( Table 6). Stotzky and Mortensen (12), and Maftoun and Banihashemi (14), confirmed that the lower production of CO 2 in soils amended with wheat straw than with alfalfa was due to the fact that straw had a higher percentage of microbially-resistant compounds such al lignin, and lower N content than alfalfa. Greater decomposition rate of alfalfa as compared with wheat straw and liquorice root refuses apparently substantiates this hypothesis that a lower nitrogen content or a wide C:N ratio is associated with lower decomposition, because the C:N ratios of alfalfa, wheat straw, and liquorice root refuse are 10.32:1, 51.21:1, and (25.65 -28.68):1, respectively (Table 4); yet, it is not the sole determinant, and other factors, e.g., chemical composition, especially abundant of lignin, may also be operative.…”
Section: Decomposition Rate Of Root Refuse Of Liquoricementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Greater decomposition rate of alfalfa as compared with wheat straw and liquorice root refuses apparently substantiates this hypothesis that a lower nitrogen content or a wide C:N ratio is associated with lower decomposition, because the C:N ratios of alfalfa, wheat straw, and liquorice root refuse are 10.32:1, 51.21:1, and (25.65 -28.68):1, respectively (Table 4); yet, it is not the sole determinant, and other factors, e.g., chemical composition, especially abundant of lignin, may also be operative. Stotzky and Mortensen (12), by presenting the cumulative CO 2 evolution curves for a peat soil treated with various amounts of rye, alfalfa, and straw and incubated for 113 days, indicated that, a stable rate of CO 2 evolution was achieved by the twentieth day. Stotzky and Mortensen (12), and Maftoun and Banihashemi (14), confirmed that the lower production of CO 2 in soils amended with wheat straw than with alfalfa was due to the fact that straw had a higher percentage of microbially-resistant compounds such al lignin, and lower N content than alfalfa.…”
Section: Decomposition Rate Of Root Refuse Of Liquoricementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations contrast with those of Jackman (1960), who found that the micro-flora of a highly developed old pasture on a North Island pumice soil did not respond to sucrose when the soil was wetted after being air-dried. The pumice soil contained 12 per cent carbon, however, as against 3.6 per cent for Craigieburn soil; in fact, it has been often found (e.g., see Stotzky and Mortensen 1957) that available carbon is the chief limiting factor to respiration in soils. The extent to which air-drying made carbon available in Craigieburn soil was indicated by plotting data from a variety of experiments, as shown in Table 4.…”
Section: -~--C--3~2~-~~~imentioning
confidence: 94%