2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cross-link stiffness on the in-plane free vibration behaviour of a two-cable network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Design scenario 2 aims at selecting proper size and stiffness for a NSD to satisfy the specified damping requirement of a cable. Equations (10) and (13) can be used to address single-mode and multimode cable vibration control, respectively. To verify these two sets NSD design equations, three dampers are designed for each of the 15 sample cables.…”
Section: Verification Of Nsd Design Equations For Design Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Design scenario 2 aims at selecting proper size and stiffness for a NSD to satisfy the specified damping requirement of a cable. Equations (10) and (13) can be used to address single-mode and multimode cable vibration control, respectively. To verify these two sets NSD design equations, three dampers are designed for each of the 15 sample cables.…”
Section: Verification Of Nsd Design Equations For Design Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recurring cable vibrations would not only cause fatigue at the cable anchorage but may also result in damage of the cable itself . Current practices for controlling detrimental cable vibrations include applying cable surface treatments, as well as installing dampers, cross‐ties, and hybrid systems . The utilization of energy‐dissipating devices, especially viscous dampers, has been a popular cable vibration control solution in the design of new cable‐stayed bridges and/or rehabilitation of existing ones .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, the nondimensional spring stiffness is related to the axial stiffness of the cross‐link, and it can vary from 0 (no connection spring) to ∞ (perfectly rigid connection). The reported nondimensional axial stiffness parameter γ 1 for cross‐link on real cable stayed bridges ranges from 0.32 to 32 . When γ 1 → ∞, the following equation can be derived from Equation : normalsinhΓ03{}2normalsinhΓ0normalsinh()Γ01+Γ02+ηnormalsinhΓ01[]normalsinh()Γ02+Γ03normalsinh()Γ01+Γ02+normalsinhΓ0normalsinhΓ02=0…”
Section: Two Identical Cablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method has been widely used by the subsequent studies mainly focusing on the influence of the mechanical properties of the cross‐ties and varied configurations on the dynamics of cable networks . For example, a two‐cable system connected with a rigid cross‐link was studied in detail by Ahmad and Cheng, and the effect of the cross‐link stiffness on cable in‐plane responses was investigated for cable networks with different configurations . The number of cross‐ties, as well as other key system parameters, have been studied in the context of a more complex cable network .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%