2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.12.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of crumb rubber on mechanical properties of multi-phase syntactic foams

Abstract: Syntactic foam is a lightweight and strong material which can be used in marine and aeronautical applications. However, the brittleness of the material limits its application to a broader range. Adding crumb rubber to the syntactic foam can increase its energy absorption capacity. The effect of crumb rubber on the fracture toughness and energy absorption capacity of 2-phase and 3-phase syntactic foam is evaluated under both static and impact loads. The experimental results have shown that the fracture toughnes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, various research efforts have been poured into enhancing the toughness of epoxy foams. Typically, a second phase consisting of soft and nonporous elastomeric particles is added into the epoxy foams to reduce their brittleness and increase their fracture toughness or fracture resistance. However, this increase in toughness and fracture resistance is often at the expense of their quasi‐static compressive properties.…”
Section: Physical and Mechanical Properties Of The Fabricated Macropomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, various research efforts have been poured into enhancing the toughness of epoxy foams. Typically, a second phase consisting of soft and nonporous elastomeric particles is added into the epoxy foams to reduce their brittleness and increase their fracture toughness or fracture resistance. However, this increase in toughness and fracture resistance is often at the expense of their quasi‐static compressive properties.…”
Section: Physical and Mechanical Properties Of The Fabricated Macropomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…but for 10 wt.% nonporous (carboxy terminated acrylonitrile butadiene) rubber particle‐filled syntactic epoxy foams with a porosity of 50%. Pham et al . reported a (single edge‐notched) fracture toughness improvement of only 8% for syntactic epoxy foam filled with 15 wt.% nonporous crumb rubber compared to unfilled syntactic epoxy foam with a porosity of 21%.…”
Section: Physical and Mechanical Properties Of The Fabricated Macropomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up-to-date, many efforts have been devoted to improve the toughness of epoxy foams, in which nanoparticles, [4][5][6] rubber elastomers, [7][8][9][10][11] fibers, [12] and thermoplastic resins (TP) [13] were used as modified fillers. Pham et al reported that for the epoxy/glass microspheres two-phase syntactic foams, introducing 15% volume fraction of crumb rubber increased the fracture toughness (8%) and the fracture energy (22%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact energy absorption of the rubberized epoxy/glass microspheres/ carbon fiber three-phase syntactic foams was increased by 24% as compared to that of the syntactic foams without crumb rubber. [8] Gupta et al used 2 vol% rubber particles to modify the compressive fracture strain and energy absorption of epoxy syntactic foams. However, the 50% decrease in Young's modulus and 10% reduction in compressive strength were found by the incorporation of crumb rubber.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel lightweight engineering materials must integrate desired combination of stiffness, strength, and toughness while enabling their high throughput fabrication into complex shapes [1]. High resistance to impact loading is among the most important properties of lightweight materials intended for structural applications in automotive parts, personal protection, and sporting goods [2][3][4][5][6][7]. To enhance fracture resistance of a cellular solid, local stiffness and strength should structurally be architected to decrease from the surface towards the interior, enabling crack deflection and reducing the crack driving force while preserving structural stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%