2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cryogenic treatment duration on the microhardness and tribological behavior of 40CrMoV5 tool steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…DCT treatment which was provided for 1 day caused the hardness to decrease to 333.59 VHN, while DCT treatment which was provided for 5 days caused the hardness to decrease to 367.75 VHN. This is the same as Thakurai et al [Thakurai et al 2021] which conducted a study on 40CrMoV5 tool steel, that the cryogenic treatment actually reduces the hardness and wear resistance. This also shows that the discussion about cryogenic treatment is debatable regarding its effectiveness [Sonar et al 2018] for a period of less than 24 hours.…”
Section: Hardnesssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DCT treatment which was provided for 1 day caused the hardness to decrease to 333.59 VHN, while DCT treatment which was provided for 5 days caused the hardness to decrease to 367.75 VHN. This is the same as Thakurai et al [Thakurai et al 2021] which conducted a study on 40CrMoV5 tool steel, that the cryogenic treatment actually reduces the hardness and wear resistance. This also shows that the discussion about cryogenic treatment is debatable regarding its effectiveness [Sonar et al 2018] for a period of less than 24 hours.…”
Section: Hardnesssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In the field of tribology, cryogenic processes have long been investigated. The cryogenic process can change the microstructure and affect its characteristics, such as ductility, toughness, yield resistance, and corrosion resistance in tool steel [Thakurai et al 2021]. Cryogenic process can also improve wear resistance because of formation of fine martensite [Meng et al 1994].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…125 66 Thakurai et al performed cryogenic treatment on AISI H13 tool steel with different soaking time 12hrs, 24hrs, 36hrs and 48hrs and found highest hardness for 36hrs sample time. 128 Microstructure of different heat-treated samples are shown in Figure 7. Up to soaking period of 24hrs not much variation in microstructure detected although there was de-carburization which is not evident in microstructure but as the soaking time increased to 36hrs or above fine carbides phase detected in micrographs which resulted from retained austenite conversion to martensite.…”
Section: Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micrograph for varous heat treated samples of AISI H13 tool steel. 128 ( a) Untreated; (b) HT + DCT (12 h); (c) HT + DCT (24 h); (d) HT + DCT (36 h) (e) HT + DCT (48 h).…”
Section: Effect Of Deep Cryogenic Treatment On Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Takım çeliği bileşenlerinin metalurjik, mekanik ve tribolojik özelliklerini iyileştirmek için çeşitli termal, mekanik ve termo-mekanik yöntemler bulunmaktadır. Dolayısıyla sıcak iş takım çeliklerinin özelliklerini iyileştirmek için uygulanabilecek yöntemlerden birisi de ısıl işlemlerdir [4]. Sıcak iş takım çeliklerinin ısıl işlemi, kütlesel özelliklerinin önemli ölçüde bağlı olduğu mikroyapısal bileşenlerin miktarını, boyutunu ve dağılımını değiştirmeye yardımcı olur.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified