2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cryorolling and annealing on recovery, recrystallisation, grain growth and their influence on mechanical and corrosion behaviour of 6082 Al alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, these results have shown that the CR + AN sample has the highest relative improvement in the fracture toughness among the samples produced through the 4 different processing routes (ie, CR, RTR, CR + AN, and RTR + AN). The CR + AN sample has ultrafine/coarse grain, small size secondary phase particles, and meta stable β″‐precipitates as discussed in our earlier work . The high relative improvement in the fracture toughness of CR + AN sample could be attributed to the presence of ultrafine/coarse grain, small size secondary phase particles, and meta stable β″‐precipitates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, these results have shown that the CR + AN sample has the highest relative improvement in the fracture toughness among the samples produced through the 4 different processing routes (ie, CR, RTR, CR + AN, and RTR + AN). The CR + AN sample has ultrafine/coarse grain, small size secondary phase particles, and meta stable β″‐precipitates as discussed in our earlier work . The high relative improvement in the fracture toughness of CR + AN sample could be attributed to the presence of ultrafine/coarse grain, small size secondary phase particles, and meta stable β″‐precipitates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…These small size secondary phase particles in the CR sample obstruct the path for dislocations movement, whereas in the RTR sample, the large size secondary phase particles are responsible for crack nucleation. The reason for high KAM in CR sample is due to suppression of dislocations annihilation by small size secondary phase particles . The LTF region is higher in the RTR sample than in the CR sample, due to strain accumulation which is high during the processing of the CR sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations