2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.10.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of crystal orientation on the strengthening of iron micro pillars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, this method has become more attractive and very popular for investigating the size effect dependence of various materials. Moreover, fundamental approaches were tried to understand the size effect dependence and deformation behaviors of small-sized materials and specially focused on different lattice types of materials such as FCC (8,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18), BCC (19)(20)(21)(22)(23), hexagonal close-packed (HCP) (24,25), metallic glasses (26-28) and nanocrystalline materials (29). The FCC metal pillars under compression exhibited a universal power-law relation between pillar diameter and strength.…”
Section: Materials Used and Pillar Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, this method has become more attractive and very popular for investigating the size effect dependence of various materials. Moreover, fundamental approaches were tried to understand the size effect dependence and deformation behaviors of small-sized materials and specially focused on different lattice types of materials such as FCC (8,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18), BCC (19)(20)(21)(22)(23), hexagonal close-packed (HCP) (24,25), metallic glasses (26-28) and nanocrystalline materials (29). The FCC metal pillars under compression exhibited a universal power-law relation between pillar diameter and strength.…”
Section: Materials Used and Pillar Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach opens an opportunity to experimentally confirm the assumed mechanism of the improved room temperature ductility of the 18Cr ferritic stainless steels by adding the stabilizing elements. However, there are a few reports on micropillar compression tests applied for ferrous materials, [18][19][20][21] regardless of various reports on single-crystal micropillars of pure bcc metals (Cr, Nb, W and Ta). [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] In micro-mechanical testing, size-dependent strength of microscale specimens (smaller is stronger) is generally known in bcc pure metals.…”
Section: Strain Rate Sensitivity Of Flow Stress Measured By Micropillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are 48 potentially active slip systems in this material of the type; <111>{110}, <111>{211} and <111>{123}, for computational efficiency only 12 slip systems are considered in this model of the type <111>{110}. These slip systems are the primary systems in BCC structures according to Du et al, 2018 andRogne &Thaulow, 2015, where it has been shown that under unconstrained loading (micro-tensile and micropillar compression tests, respectively) primary slip in BCC structures occurs mainly on these slip systems. Du et al, 2018 show that under constrained loading primary or secondary slip can occur on the <111>{211} systems, with no evidence found of slip occurring on the <111>{123} system.…”
Section: Microscale Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%