2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.12.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of CuO addition on magnetic and electrical properties of Sr2Bi4Ti5O18 lead-free ferroelectric ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extrapolation of the linear region (Figure 8B) gives the optical bandgap of each material under this study. The bandgap ( E g ) values are 3.22, 3.13, 3.20, and 2.9 eV for SBT‐0, SBT‐5, SBT‐10, and SBT‐20, respectively, and these values are very closely matched with earlier reported pure SBT ceramic 44,52 . Though we are not able to establish a definite relationship between optical bandgap and composition, we could see that incorporation of ZS leads to a reduction of bandgap due to additional defect energy levels via concentration of oxygen vacancies and structural distortions which could be the main reason for the variation of the optical bandgap of the material 53,54 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extrapolation of the linear region (Figure 8B) gives the optical bandgap of each material under this study. The bandgap ( E g ) values are 3.22, 3.13, 3.20, and 2.9 eV for SBT‐0, SBT‐5, SBT‐10, and SBT‐20, respectively, and these values are very closely matched with earlier reported pure SBT ceramic 44,52 . Though we are not able to establish a definite relationship between optical bandgap and composition, we could see that incorporation of ZS leads to a reduction of bandgap due to additional defect energy levels via concentration of oxygen vacancies and structural distortions which could be the main reason for the variation of the optical bandgap of the material 53,54 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The bandgap (E g ) values are 3.22, 3.13, 3.20, and 2.9 eV for SBT-0, SBT-5, SBT-10, and SBT-20, respectively, and these values are very closely matched with earlier reported pure SBT ceramic. 44,52 Though we are not able to establish a definite relationship between optical bandgap and composition, we could see that incorporation of ZS leads to a reduction of bandgap due to additional defect energy levels via concentration of oxygen vacancies and structural distortions which could be the main reason for the variation of the optical bandgap of the material. 53,54 In essence from the structure-property correlations discussed here, embedding ZS into the matrix of SBT ceramics resulted in a novel composite electro-ceramic relevant for practical ferroelectric device applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Hence, in the current article we investigated the effect of CuO modification on the dielectric, ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties of SBTi. The CuO is a well-known sintering aid, which can influence the density as well as electric properties of SBTi [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For x = 0.5 mol% sample, squareness ratio of the loop is almost equal to 2 which express better uniformity and homogeneity in grain size and therefore the remnant polarization was enhanced by means of domain reorientation. Moreover, very low internal bias field of -0.09 kV/cm was created in x = 0.5 mol% sample, which is also comparable to undoped SBT 5 ceramics and it shows that the domain stability is relatively better after adding CuO into SBT 6 ceramics [29].…”
Section: Ferroelectric Studiesmentioning
confidence: 63%