2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.03.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of current pulsing and “self-oxidation” on the CO tolerance of a PEM fuel cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adsorbed CO is then electrochemically oxidised on the anode catalyst surface above a certain limiting overpotential. This in turn releases the active sites earlier occupied by CO [10,[20][21][22][23]. The simple dynamic modelling proposed by Zhang and Datta [10] was mainly based on this mechanism and was able to successfully describe most experimental observations.…”
Section: The Influence Of the Current Density On Potential Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorbed CO is then electrochemically oxidised on the anode catalyst surface above a certain limiting overpotential. This in turn releases the active sites earlier occupied by CO [10,[20][21][22][23]. The simple dynamic modelling proposed by Zhang and Datta [10] was mainly based on this mechanism and was able to successfully describe most experimental observations.…”
Section: The Influence Of the Current Density On Potential Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential oscillations, instabilities and steadystate multiplies have also been observed and simulated in PEMFCs, which are resulted generally from dynamic CO poisoning/reactivating, mass transfer limitation, and/or reactant concentration gradients. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] However, there is still limited work done so far on the potential oscillations in the PEMFCs with CO-containing H 2 feed for understanding the complicated processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this is seen in the asymmetry of the voltage oscillations . In a subsequent study, Thomason et al (2004) brought the fi ndings of in context with methods to increase the CO tolerance of PEMFCs, such as air bleed (e.g., Gottesfeld and Pafford 1988 ), current pulsing (e.g., Carrette et al 2001 ), and Figure 12 Diagram taken from Hanke -Rauschenbach et al (2010) illustrating the behavior of the spatially distributed system for low feed fl ow rates: (A) temporal evolution of the cell voltage U cell ( t ); spatiotemporal evolution of the (B) anode double layer potential ∆ ϕ ( z , t ); (C) CO surface coverage θ CO (z, t ); (D) local anodic current density i a ( z , t ), and (E) CO mole fraction in the gas channel x CO (z, t ). Reproduced from Hanke -Rauschenbach et al (2010) by permission of ECS -The Electrochemical Society.…”
Section: Technical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 86%