2002
DOI: 10.1081/css-120005755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of current-season application of calcitic lime and phosphorus fertilization on potato tuber phosphorus concentration and leaf chemical composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biggest change was between the second and third sampling dates. Maier et al (2002b) sampled the fifth leaf from the terminal (on two or three dates in separate experiments) and showed a similar seasonal decline in leaf P. Only in 2003 did we find a declining pattern in petiole P that followed the general results of these experiments. Freeman et al studied two cultivars over 3 years and they did find increases in petiole P between the third and fourth sampling dates in 1 year for both of the Russet Burbank treatments receiving P fertilizer.…”
Section: Petiole Phosphorussupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The biggest change was between the second and third sampling dates. Maier et al (2002b) sampled the fifth leaf from the terminal (on two or three dates in separate experiments) and showed a similar seasonal decline in leaf P. Only in 2003 did we find a declining pattern in petiole P that followed the general results of these experiments. Freeman et al studied two cultivars over 3 years and they did find increases in petiole P between the third and fourth sampling dates in 1 year for both of the Russet Burbank treatments receiving P fertilizer.…”
Section: Petiole Phosphorussupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Values followed by the same letter in the same row are not significantly different (P < 0.05) according to the LSD test ns not statistically significant; £ P < 0.1; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 1978) for aerial (3.5-1.0 g kg −1 DM) and tuber (4.2-1.5 g kg −1 DM) fractions of potato plants grown under different soil P availability conditions. The increase in tuber P concentration with the application of P fertilizers has also been reported by other researchers (Maier et al 2002;Sanderson et al 2003;Rosen and Bierman 2008;Mendoza-Cortez et al 2013;Fernandes et al 2015), with the magnitude varying according to the edaphic characteristics and the cultivars used. As a result of the decrease in the P concentration in aerial and tuber fractions associated with the dilution effect, the P concentration in the TB decreased for all the treatments as the growing season progressed from 40 to 100 DAP, with values ranging from 4.6 to 1.1 g kg −1 DM ( Table 4).…”
Section: Phosphorus Accumulationsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The P rates influenced, separately, only the N concentration in leaves, providing increased concentration until the estimated rate of 121 mg dm -3 P (Table 2). This increase in leaf N concentration occurred because the P fertilization increases the N concentration in the potato leaves (MAIER et al, 2002) and the amounts of N taken up by the plants (MUNDA et al, 2015;FERNANDES, 2016), due to the fact of P interacts with N uptake (FAGERIA, 2001). At the lower P rates, the N concentration in leaves was deficient, but at the higher P rates, they were within the range considered adequate by Lorenzi et al (1997) (40-50 g kg -1 N), indicating that P fertilization also improved the N nutrition of the potato plants (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%