2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-018-1440-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Cutting Tool Properties and Depth of Cut in Rock Cutting: An Experimental Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At shallow penetration depths, the friction force between the diamond particle and rock bottom sides is negligible and any increase in cutting force is due to the increase of penetration depth per rotation before it reaches the critical penetration depth (Detournay et al, 2008;Zhou and Detournay, 2014). Beyond the critical value of the penetration depth, the normal component of frictional force reaches a stable value and a limited value of the effective contact stress has also occurred (Rostamsowlat, 2018). In this stage, the incremental cutting response is governed by the pure cutting of the diamond particle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At shallow penetration depths, the friction force between the diamond particle and rock bottom sides is negligible and any increase in cutting force is due to the increase of penetration depth per rotation before it reaches the critical penetration depth (Detournay et al, 2008;Zhou and Detournay, 2014). Beyond the critical value of the penetration depth, the normal component of frictional force reaches a stable value and a limited value of the effective contact stress has also occurred (Rostamsowlat, 2018). In this stage, the incremental cutting response is governed by the pure cutting of the diamond particle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results also show that the friction angle (φ) mobilized at the wear flat-rock interface is comparable with the internal friction angle (ϕ) of the rock under certain conditions (wear flat roughness, dry sample) [6,1,31,24,17,2,42]. Dagrain [15] and Rostamsowlat [44] have also shown that reducing the wear flat roughness can lead to a reduction in the friction coefficient which in turn leads to an increase in the contact stress (σ 3q−5q).…”
Section: Rock Cuttingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The onset of the plastic regime is located at about η p 30 which compares well with the results of numerical simulation [51], the limit scaled stress ( p ) is found equal to about 3.2 and 4.5 for Tuffeau and Mountain Gold, respectively, against about 2 for numerical simulation. However, numerical simulation assumes a friction coefficient at the interface quite high (µ = 0.557) while experimental results indicate a much lower value (for this particular cutter [43,44]), as presented in Fig. 18.…”
Section: Three Regimes Of Frictional Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This parameter has been successfully used to characterise the efficiency of a cutting tool in metal cutting (Khan et al, 2014(Khan et al, , 2012Sarwar, 1998;Sarwar et al, 2009Sarwar et al, , 2007 and it has been used in the drilling industry as a measure of cost per unit volume of rock removed (Atici and Ersoy, 2009) and correlated with other rock properties (Ersoy and Waller, 1995;Mohammadi et al, 2020;Rostamsowlat, 2018;Wang et al, 2018;Yurdakul and Akdasç, 2012).…”
Section: Figure 1 Chip Formation Model In Rock Cutting (Adapted From ...mentioning
confidence: 99%