2004
DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200408000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Cyclical Mechanical Stretch and Exogenous Transforming Growth Factor-??1 on Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Activity in Lamina Cribrosa Cells from the Human Optic Nerve Head

Abstract: These results suggest that cyclical stretch and TGF-beta1 modulate MMP-2 activity in human lamina cribrosa cells. TGF-beta 1 and MMP-2 release from lamina cribrosa cells may facilitate matrix remodeling of the optic nerve head in primary open angle glaucoma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In vitro biaxial cell stretch systems have rapidly become standard models for studying the effects of mechanical forces on a variety of cell types, including trabecular meshwork cells (Bradley et al, 2001(Bradley et al, , 2003WuDunn, 2001), lamina cribrosa cells (Kirwan et al, 2004(Kirwan et al, , 2005 and scleral fibroblasts (Fujikura et al, 2002;Cui et al, 2004). These studies have attempted to model intraocular forces by introducing mechanical distortion (4 -15% increases in cellular surface area) to ocular cells for durations and frequencies ranging from <1 sec at 1 cycle/second (Kirwan et al, 2004(Kirwan et al, , 2005, 30 seconds at 2 cycles/minute (Fujikura et al, 2002), or constant stretch for 30 minutes -72 hours (Cui et al, 2004, Bradley et al, 2001.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In vitro biaxial cell stretch systems have rapidly become standard models for studying the effects of mechanical forces on a variety of cell types, including trabecular meshwork cells (Bradley et al, 2001(Bradley et al, , 2003WuDunn, 2001), lamina cribrosa cells (Kirwan et al, 2004(Kirwan et al, , 2005 and scleral fibroblasts (Fujikura et al, 2002;Cui et al, 2004). These studies have attempted to model intraocular forces by introducing mechanical distortion (4 -15% increases in cellular surface area) to ocular cells for durations and frequencies ranging from <1 sec at 1 cycle/second (Kirwan et al, 2004(Kirwan et al, , 2005, 30 seconds at 2 cycles/minute (Fujikura et al, 2002), or constant stretch for 30 minutes -72 hours (Cui et al, 2004, Bradley et al, 2001.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have attempted to model intraocular forces by introducing mechanical distortion (4 -15% increases in cellular surface area) to ocular cells for durations and frequencies ranging from <1 sec at 1 cycle/second (Kirwan et al, 2004(Kirwan et al, , 2005, 30 seconds at 2 cycles/minute (Fujikura et al, 2002), or constant stretch for 30 minutes -72 hours (Cui et al, 2004, Bradley et al, 2001. Because the forces exerted at the posterior ocular pole represent a combination of relatively static factors (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, continuous mechanically deformable pathways are going from extracellular matrix via integrins, clustered membrane-bound structures, actin- and intermediate filaments to the nuclear matrix and chromosomes (Maniotis et al, 1997a, b). Taking this into consideration, it looks but natural that several families of the developmentally important genes can be directly affected by mechanical means, namely by permanent or cyclic tension, pressure or stress relaxation (Resnik et al, 1993;Christen & Slack, 1999;Kessler et al, 2001;Chiquet et al, 2003;Brouzes &Farge,2004;Kirwan et al, 2004). Mechanical forces can also affect the transcription rate (D'Addario et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult to imagine how the three-dimensional structure of an embryo is regulated by genetic pathways alone. Furthermore, recent works on molecular mechanisms of embryonic development and cell differentiation have shown the context-dependency of gene expression and function (Galbraith and Sheetz, 1998;Wray and Abouheif, 1998;Chiquet, 1999;Eizinger et al, 1999;Gilbert and Sarkar, 2000;Grbic, 2000;Wu et al, 2001;Kirwan et al, 2004;Tian et al, 2004). These are the main reasons for current changes in the approach to understanding the role of epigenetic factors in development, differentiation and evolution of morphological features (Gilbert and Sarkar, 2000;Goodwin, 2000;Newman and Muller, 2000;Wilkins, 2001;Strohman, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%