2017
DOI: 10.1364/ol.42.004792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of dark counts on single-photon heralding with quasi-number-resolving detection schemes

Abstract: We consider photon heralding with quasi-number-resolving detection schemes and account for detection efficiencies and dark count probabilities. With a straightforward formalism, we develop closed-form expressions for the heralding probability, photon number distribution of the resulting heralded state, and fidelity of this heralded state to a single-photon state. We calculate that this fidelity has a maximum as a function of the number of multiplexed detection modes and that, for experimental configurations in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the experimental imperfections, like the optical losses both in the state manipulation and target state detection, the measured photon statistics are often degraded and the fragile quantum features are lost [14,15]. In order to decouple the effect of these two loss contributions one can investigate the target state properties with the help of the normalized factorial moments of the photon number that can be extracted independent of the detection losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the experimental imperfections, like the optical losses both in the state manipulation and target state detection, the measured photon statistics are often degraded and the fragile quantum features are lost [14,15]. In order to decouple the effect of these two loss contributions one can investigate the target state properties with the help of the normalized factorial moments of the photon number that can be extracted independent of the detection losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%