1992
DOI: 10.1109/61.141878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of DC testing water tree deteriorated cable and a preliminary evaluation of VLF as alternate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternative testing techniques are therefore needed in order to overcome the disadvantages of current dc HV tests. The very low-frequency voltage between power frequency and dc, such as 0.1 Hz, is often used in HV testing of power cables [12,13]. However, the frequency dependence of space charge under 0.1 Hz ac voltage is not yet clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative testing techniques are therefore needed in order to overcome the disadvantages of current dc HV tests. The very low-frequency voltage between power frequency and dc, such as 0.1 Hz, is often used in HV testing of power cables [12,13]. However, the frequency dependence of space charge under 0.1 Hz ac voltage is not yet clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suitability, practicality, and effectiveness of the testing method for service-aged power cables with extruded dielectric insulation will have to be determined based on several criteria: 1. At what voltage level can a defect be detected?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of dc, ac (at powerline frequency), and VLF (0.1 Hz sinusoid) testing of cables with PE and XLPE-type insulation by Groenefeld [6] and von Olshausen [7] showed that, due to a space charge build-up around defects in PE and XLPE insulation, (1) dc testing is inadequate in determining the In contrast, when comparing a sinusoidal 0.1 Hz with a 50 Hz test voltage, the previously mentioned researchers found that the greater the severity of the fault or damage to the insulation, the lower the voltage level at which a partial discharge or a defect breakdown occurred.…”
Section: Comparing DC Ac and Vlfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the mass production of XLPE cable, the requirement for the HV testing system is increasing. Compared with the direct current (DC) HV test system, the very low frequency (VLF) HV test system that was proposed in [1][2][3] does not accumulate charge in the insulation layer or damage the insulation of the cable. Considering the advantages in the volume, weight, and energy consumption of VLF HV test systems over power frequency HV test equipment, the VLF testing concept was adopted as a standard by the European Union in 1996 and by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) in 2006 (IEC60060- .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%