2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of decentration and tilt on the image quality of aspheric intraocular lens designs in a model eye

Abstract: Overall, modern aspheric IOLs provided better imaging quality than conventional spherical IOL designs. Aberration-free IOLs were less sensitive to decentration and tilt than aberration-correcting IOLs but provided better image quality than spherical IOLs. Aberration-correcting IOLs have the potential to provide diffraction-limited imaging quality when perfectly aligned.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
108
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
14
108
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Posterior corneal changes after EK affect its parallelism with the anterior corneal surface. 139 These changes include tilt and decentration, which have both been reported to increase whole-eye HOAs in the context of intraocular lenses, 16,35 and increased corneal thickness. 139 Disruption of parallelism may reduce the compensatory ability of the posterior cornea, exaggerating the effects of anterior corneal irregularity and increasing whole eye HOAs, 54,77,139 and negatively impacting the modulation transfer function.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posterior corneal changes after EK affect its parallelism with the anterior corneal surface. 139 These changes include tilt and decentration, which have both been reported to increase whole-eye HOAs in the context of intraocular lenses, 16,35 and increased corneal thickness. 139 Disruption of parallelism may reduce the compensatory ability of the posterior cornea, exaggerating the effects of anterior corneal irregularity and increasing whole eye HOAs, 54,77,139 and negatively impacting the modulation transfer function.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We simulated postoperative wavefront aberrations of eyes through the use of spherical IOLs in which there were no preoperative problems or intraoperative/postoperative complications (e.g., clinically detectable tilt or decentration of IOL) which could offset the possible benefits of an aspheric IOL [3,4,22,23]. In a previous pilot study (not published), we measured HOAs of IOLs using an optical bench, and found that the HOAs of the AR40e IOL was almost zero.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] Nowadays, the implantation of an aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) has become popular after cataract surgery, as well as wavefront correction in refractive surgery [3,4]. Theoretically, an aspheric IOL should improve retinal image quality by compensating corneal spherical aberration (SA), which is the major cause of decreasing image quality and is usually positive in eyes with cataracts [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to an aspheric IOL with negative SA designed to offset the positive SA of the average cornea, the so-called aberration-free IOL has no SA [22]. The latter has proved to be more resistant to decentration and tilt than the former, and still provides better image quality than spherical IOLs [23], [24]. Between the aberration-compensating and the aberration-free IOLs, a variety of aspheric lenses with intermediate SA values are currently available for clinical practice.…”
Section: High Order Aberration Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%