2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/2757542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Deficiencies in the Tunnel Crown Thickness on Pressure Tunnels with Posttensioned Concrete Linings

Abstract: is paper investigates the effect of deficiencies in the tunnel crown thickness on pressure tunnels with the posttensioned concrete lining. Based on the lining parameters of the Yellow River Crossing Tunnel, the modeling approach of the posttensioned concrete lining is introduced in detail and a three-dimensional finite element model is established. e three-dimensional finite element model is validated by experimental results from the full-scale model experiment of the Yellow River Crossing Tunnel. Special atte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, during the water filling test before the operation of the tunnel, a large area of leakage occurred in some tunnel sections. According to the comprehensive investigation, it was caused by the insufficient thickness of the inner prestressed lining crown for which the design thickness was 0.45 m (Qin et al, 2018). As shown in Figure 14, to eliminate the adverse effect of the insufficient thickness of the lining structure and ensure that the water conveyance plan of the project was realized on schedule, some reinforcement schemes were formulated with different degrees of insufficient thickness.…”
Section: Case Study Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, during the water filling test before the operation of the tunnel, a large area of leakage occurred in some tunnel sections. According to the comprehensive investigation, it was caused by the insufficient thickness of the inner prestressed lining crown for which the design thickness was 0.45 m (Qin et al, 2018). As shown in Figure 14, to eliminate the adverse effect of the insufficient thickness of the lining structure and ensure that the water conveyance plan of the project was realized on schedule, some reinforcement schemes were formulated with different degrees of insufficient thickness.…”
Section: Case Study Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dimensions of the finite element model are based on boundary convergence study. Initially, the thickness of tunnel lining has been kept as 0.22 m 7,28‐30 and later, it has been varied as 0.35 m, 31 0.45 m, and 0.55 m. Four different depths of overburden have been considered in the present analysis are 5 m, 7.5 m, 10 m, and 12.5 m and the tunnel has a diameter of 6 m.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a key aspect in the engineering of highway routes, the technology for building tunnels has gradually improved over time [1][2][3]. Shed tunnel protection structures are special tunnel structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%