2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of deformation temperature on the ductile–brittle transition behavior of a modified 9Cr–1Mo steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ren 2 carried out tensile tests of a 420-MPa steel with temperature ranging from 0°C down to −90°C and found that the Lüders strain [3][4][5] increased as the temperature decreased. For most structural steels, as the temperature decreases continuously, the fracture behaviour will transform from ductile to brittle (DBT), [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] reducing the steels' ductility and fracture toughness. The DBT occurs when the temperature decreases down to the steel's DBT temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ren 2 carried out tensile tests of a 420-MPa steel with temperature ranging from 0°C down to −90°C and found that the Lüders strain [3][4][5] increased as the temperature decreased. For most structural steels, as the temperature decreases continuously, the fracture behaviour will transform from ductile to brittle (DBT), [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] reducing the steels' ductility and fracture toughness. The DBT occurs when the temperature decreases down to the steel's DBT temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence of dislocation sub‐structure and high fraction of low‐angle boundaries (LAB) with 2–15° misorientation angle possibly damage impact properties, by enhancing the matrix strength and reducing the ability of plastic deformation. On the other hand, presence of large fraction of HAB is effective in resisting the cleavage crack propagation, which is beneficial for the impact toughness …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Series of load vs displacement and absorbed energy vs displacement curves obtained by the impact tests of the steel subjected to ausforming and tempforming are shown in Fig. 6 with indication of the characteristic points of general yield load (P GY ), maximum load (P m ), fast fracture load (P F ) and arrest load (P A ) [34][35][36][37][38][39]. The sample subjected to ausforming and tested at room temperature exhibits high V-notch impact adsorbed energy of 140 J.…”
Section: Impact Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample subjected to ausforming and tested at room temperature exhibits high V-notch impact adsorbed energy of 140 J. The displacement range exceeds the size of the central portion of the impact specimen that is characteristic of a fracture when the crack propagation path before the separation of the sample into two parts is much larger than the sample thickness [13,[34][35][36][37][38][39]. The arrest load after the fast fracture propagation takes place at a displacement of about 7 mm.…”
Section: Impact Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%