2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of delayed cell processing and cryopreservation on immunophenotyping in multicenter population studies

Abstract: Variability induced by delayed cell processing and cell cryopreservation presents unique challenges for immunophenotyping in large population studies. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the effect of delayed cell processing and cryopreservation on cell percentages obtained by immunophenotyping. We collected blood from 20 volunteers and compared the effect of (a) delayed cell processing up to 72 h (b) cryopreservation and (c) the combined effect of delayed cell processing and cryopreservation on immunopheno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have attempted to minimize the effects of these limitations by imputing data for random errors and comparing cryopreserved data from this study with data obtained from a previous study on whole blood performed in MESA examination 4, 22 , 25 as well as literature on the use of cryopreserved cells. 38 An additional limitation relates to variable timing of blood draws for PBMC processing, which generally occurred in the mornings but not at the same time for each individual (eg, 8 am versus 11 am ). Given emerging data indicating intraindividual circadian variations in circulating immune cell subsets, 39 there is potential unmeasured confounding related to the timing of blood draws.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have attempted to minimize the effects of these limitations by imputing data for random errors and comparing cryopreserved data from this study with data obtained from a previous study on whole blood performed in MESA examination 4, 22 , 25 as well as literature on the use of cryopreserved cells. 38 An additional limitation relates to variable timing of blood draws for PBMC processing, which generally occurred in the mornings but not at the same time for each individual (eg, 8 am versus 11 am ). Given emerging data indicating intraindividual circadian variations in circulating immune cell subsets, 39 there is potential unmeasured confounding related to the timing of blood draws.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations include the observational nature of the data and technical issues with complex samples which resulted in some missing data. The use of cryopreserved PBMCs may result in different absolute levels of some of the subsets as compared with whole blood [ 25 ], although relative levels should be preserved [ 34 ]. Further, the immune cell distributions measured in this study from cryopreserved samples are similar to those previously measured in fresh whole blood obtained in MESA at Exam 4 (2005–2007) [ 8 , 9 ] among phenotypes measured in both studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations include the observational nature of the data and technical issues with complex samples which resulted in some missing data. The use of cryopreserved PBMCs may result in different absolute levels of some of the subsets as compared with whole blood [25], although relative levels should be preserved [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflicting results might be derived from the choice of study material, as Colonna-Romano et al used separated PBMCs and our data are based on the analysis of fresh whole blood, which again illustrates the necessity of harmonization of flow cytometric methods in order to compare results from different studies in a meaningful way. Many authors have emphasized the critical part of methodical differences as the main source of variability in flow cytometric immunophenotyping [1,39,40].…”
Section: B Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%