2018
DOI: 10.3390/w10121784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Density and Total Weight on Flow Depth, Velocity, and Stresses in Loess Debris Flows

Abstract: Debris flows that involve loess material produce important damage around the world. However, the kinematics of such processes are poorly understood. To better understand these kinematics, we used a flume to measure the kinematics of debris flows with different mixture densities and weights. We used sensors to measure pore fluid pressure and total normal stress. We measured flow patterns, velocities, and depths using a high-speed camera and laser range finder to identify the temporal evolution of the flow behav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geotechnical measurements showed low unit weight (Table 2) supporting that the thickness of the flow is moderated. These which favours a faster movement, increasing lateral erosion according to field results [Shu et al, 2018]. The lahar deposits show granulometric differences, with strong graduation from the fracture zone (proximal zone) to the final deposition zone (distal zone).…”
Section: Field Evidencementioning
confidence: 72%
“…Geotechnical measurements showed low unit weight (Table 2) supporting that the thickness of the flow is moderated. These which favours a faster movement, increasing lateral erosion according to field results [Shu et al, 2018]. The lahar deposits show granulometric differences, with strong graduation from the fracture zone (proximal zone) to the final deposition zone (distal zone).…”
Section: Field Evidencementioning
confidence: 72%
“…It should be noted that there may be a certain relationship between the flow depth and velocity, but it should depend on the actual terrain that the debris flow occurs (Shu et al, 2018). In this study, the overall distribution of the flow depth and velocity in the channel is similar, but some specific characteristics vary.…”
Section: Hazard Mapping and Vulnerability Estimationmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The abrasive process has both sliding friction properties and rolling friction and micro-corrosion friction properties [26]. As a multiphase and multi-ingredient fluid, debris flow should be considered as a structural fluid composed of slurry and coarse particles [27,28]. Special friction pairs are formed by debris flow and the structural surface of a drainage channel, forming the macro-phenomenon of scour, abrasion or deposition upon the structural surface.…”
Section: Composition and Influencing Factors Of Abrasion Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%