1996
DOI: 10.1002/prep.19960210108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of density gradient and porosity on HMX/TNT pressure cast shaped charge performance

Abstract: Der EiduR des Dichtegradienten und der Porositkit a d die Leistung von druckgegossenen HMXITNT-HohlladungenPrikisions-Hohlladungen werden hergestellt unter Einsatz der Druck-GieBtechnik. Die Porositat und Lunker, die durch RBntgenaufnahmen in den Ladungen nicht nachgewiesen werden konnen, wurden die Leistung dieser Hohlladungen betrachtlich beeinflussen. Die Wirkung der Porosiat auf die Eigenschaften, wie Dichte, Detonationsgeschwindigkeit (VOD), CJ-Druck und Stachelgeschwindigkeit ist vorausgesagt worden. Dic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because of difference in density of solid ingredients as compared to molten TNT. It is known that 2% porosity decreases the density of an explosive charge by about 0.04 g cm À3 , which in turn reduces the velocity of detonation (VOD) by about 150 m s À1 [3]. This corresponds to a reduction of about 5% of explosive energy [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because of difference in density of solid ingredients as compared to molten TNT. It is known that 2% porosity decreases the density of an explosive charge by about 0.04 g cm À3 , which in turn reduces the velocity of detonation (VOD) by about 150 m s À1 [3]. This corresponds to a reduction of about 5% of explosive energy [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, 0.05 g/cc increase in density by adopting controlled cooling will better the explosive energy by 10 %. Reduction of porosity from 2% to 0.5%, would result in an improvement of VOD, detonation pressure and Shaped charge jet velocity by 1.2%, 4.5%, and 1.7% respectively 18 . 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%