2016
DOI: 10.1002/jccs.201600205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Dielectric Constant of Solvents on the Particle Size and Bandgap of La/SnO2‐TiO2 Nanoparticles and Their Catalytic Properties

Abstract: Lanthanum (La) supported on tin oxide‐titanium oxide (SnO2‐TiO2 ) nanoparticles were prepared by a sol–gel method followed by a hydrothermal method. Effect of different solvents (ethyl acetate, benzyl alcohol, ethylene glycol) on the particle size and catalytic activity was investigated. The nanomaterial was characterized by transmission electron microscopy, powder X‐ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and energy dispersive X‐ray. The catalytic and optical pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optical study of GO, rGO, Sm 2 O 3 , Sm 2 O 3 /GO, and Sm 2 O 3 /rGO nanocomposite was carried out by using their UV–Visible absorption data in the wavelength range of 200–600 nm. The optical bandgap was calculated by applying the Wood and Tauc Equation 2 [ 41–44 ] : αhv=A()hvgoodbreak−Egtrue1n By rearranging Equation : ()αhv2=AhvnormalEnormalg Where the value of n is 2 for direct transition, hv is the photon energy (eV), A is absorption constant, E g is the bandgap energy (eV), and α (cm −1 ) is the absorption coefficient was calculated by using Equation 4 [ 45,46 ] : α=k/λ where k is the extinction coefficient and λ represents the wavelength of the incident photon. The extrapolating linear region of the plot ()αhv2 versus hv met the abscissa and provided the value of the optical bandgap.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optical study of GO, rGO, Sm 2 O 3 , Sm 2 O 3 /GO, and Sm 2 O 3 /rGO nanocomposite was carried out by using their UV–Visible absorption data in the wavelength range of 200–600 nm. The optical bandgap was calculated by applying the Wood and Tauc Equation 2 [ 41–44 ] : αhv=A()hvgoodbreak−Egtrue1n By rearranging Equation : ()αhv2=AhvnormalEnormalg Where the value of n is 2 for direct transition, hv is the photon energy (eV), A is absorption constant, E g is the bandgap energy (eV), and α (cm −1 ) is the absorption coefficient was calculated by using Equation 4 [ 45,46 ] : α=k/λ where k is the extinction coefficient and λ represents the wavelength of the incident photon. The extrapolating linear region of the plot ()αhv2 versus hv met the abscissa and provided the value of the optical bandgap.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38][39][40] The optical study of GO, rGO, Sm 2 O 3 , Sm 2 O 3 /GO, and Sm 2 O 3 /rGO nanocomposite was carried out by using their UV-Visible absorption data in the wavelength range of 200-600 nm. The optical bandgap was calculated by applying the Wood and Tauc Equation 2 [41][42][43][44] :…”
Section: Ultraviolet-visible Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the catalytic activity, 3 mg of each nanocatalyst was added to 25 mL of 40 ppm of MB, rhodamine B and ciprofloxacin solution, stirred the solution under magnetic stirring at room temperature conditions. Catalytic activity was analyzed using the UV‐visible spectrophotometer and change in absorbance of the MB solution was observed at λ max 664 nm after an interval of 5 min (Farrukh, Muneer, et al, 2016). Same procedure was followed to check the catalytic activity against rhodamine B and ciprofloxacin at λ max of 554 nm for 274 nm, respectively (Iram & Farrukh, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%