1994
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1994.1241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Dielectric Saturation on Disjoining Pressure in Thin Films of Aqueous Electrolytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could, for example, imply that on close approach (in contact) the total charge on the two surfaces, including any bound ions, becomes zero. Such a charge regulation mechanism results in interaction curves between the extremes of constant charge and constant potential (31,32). Another important feature of the experimental interaction curves in Fig.…”
Section: Force Measurements Between Amino-functionalized Silica Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This could, for example, imply that on close approach (in contact) the total charge on the two surfaces, including any bound ions, becomes zero. Such a charge regulation mechanism results in interaction curves between the extremes of constant charge and constant potential (31,32). Another important feature of the experimental interaction curves in Fig.…”
Section: Force Measurements Between Amino-functionalized Silica Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The potential energy of repulsion between 2:1 phyllosilicate layers is the sum of the net hydration energy for the interlayer cations (Gh0)), the net hydration energy for the negative surface charge sites (Gh(s)) and Born repulsion energy (Gb). Net hydration energies may be estimated using the Born equation (Basu and Sharma 1994) as the change in electrostatic free energy of an ion on reversibly and isothermally moving the ion from a solution of one dielectric to another. By using this approach, the net hydration energy for interlayer cations in 2:1 phyllosilicates becomes:…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, with a decreasing separation, the surface charge decreases and the assumption of a smeared-out surface charge becomes increasingly difficult to uphold, while at low enough separations the number of atom "layers" between the surfaces may become too low for a continuum approach to be appropriate. Despite these important reservations, the PB equation certainly has predictive power for the interaction of close hydrophilic surfaces in water: the PB equation (together with Van der Waals attraction) quantitatively describes the steep repulsion that has been found between close oxidic surfaces in the surface force apparatus and the atomic force microscope (3)(4)(5) and explains the possibility of a deep and reversible potential minimum for very close surfaces (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%