2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0044-8486(02)00129-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of dietary cellulose on digestion in the prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the results of digestibility, which decreased with increasing cellulose inclusion Borrer & Lawrence (1989) observed that the level of dietary cellulose affected apparent protein digestibility in Farfantepenaeus aztecus, by lowering digestibility values as cellulose levels increased. A similar result was observed in Macrobrachium rosenbergii (González-Peña et al, 2002). On the other hand, in L. vannamei the protein digestibility did not change with the different levels of cellulose (Borrer & Lawrence, 1989;Guo et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in agreement with the results of digestibility, which decreased with increasing cellulose inclusion Borrer & Lawrence (1989) observed that the level of dietary cellulose affected apparent protein digestibility in Farfantepenaeus aztecus, by lowering digestibility values as cellulose levels increased. A similar result was observed in Macrobrachium rosenbergii (González-Peña et al, 2002). On the other hand, in L. vannamei the protein digestibility did not change with the different levels of cellulose (Borrer & Lawrence, 1989;Guo et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…So, it is possible that the dietary fiber with high viscosity reduces the interaction between the enzymes and substrates, reducing absorption rates. The binding capability of the dietary fiber is another possible factor that can reduce the availability of nutrients (González-Peña et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoglucanase activity has been detected in a number of commercially important crustacean species, including Penaeus japonicus (Yokoe & Yasumasu 1964), Euphausia superba (Chen & Chen 1983), Homarus gammarus (Glass & Stark 1995), Cherax quadricarinatus (Xue, Anderson, Richardson, Anderson, Xue & Mather 1999), Scylla serrata (Pavosovic, Richardson, Anderson, Mann & Mather 2004), Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Gonzalez‐Pena, Anderson, Smith & Moreira 2002) and Litopenaeus vannamei (Moss, Divakaran & Kim 2001). Endoxylanase activity has also been reported in C. quadricarinatus (Xue 1998), E. superba (Turkiewicz, Kalinowska, Zielinska & Bielecki 2000) and S. serrata (Pavosovic et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that cellulase activity in crustaceans can increase in response to higher levels of dietary polysaccharides, such as cellulose or starch (Gonzalez‐Pena et al . ; Pavasovic et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%