Effect of different adhesive protocols on bond strength between composite resins for indirect use and repair materials

Isolan, Cristina Pereira; Moreira, Andressa Goicochea; Ribeiro, Juliana Silva; Nakanishi, Leina; Cuevas‐Suárez, Carlos Enrique

doi:10.1080/01694243.2019.1654699

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, in the immediate groups, the TBS of all tested 10-MDP-containing adhesives was much higher than with the control adhesive, which is similar with the findings of an earlier investigation. 10 Similar to the conclusions of Isolan et al [21] and Suarez et al6, although in contrast to results from a previous investigation, the composition of the 10-MDP-containing adhesives varied in this study but did not produce significantly different TBS [22]. We therefore agreed with our initial theory.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Bond Strength of Low-Viscosity Bulk-Fill Composite and Adhesives Using 10-Methacryloyloxydecyl Dihydrogen Phosphate (10-Mdp)

KATTA,

M.S.,

Shiroorkar

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conclusion: When applied to the air-abraded Filtek™ Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative composite surface, 10-MDP-containing adhesives perform better than 10-MDP-free adhesives. The binding strength was unaffected by the 10-MDP-containing adhesives' chemical makeup. The bond strength endurance of adhesives containing 10-MDP decreases with age. Keywords: keyword 1; keyword 2; keywords: low-viscosity bulk fill composite, universal adhesives, self-etch adhesive, 10-MDP, aging, bond strength.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Bond Strength of Low-Viscosity Bulk-Fill Composite and Adhesives Using 10-Methacryloyloxydecyl Dihydrogen Phosphate (10-Mdp)

KATTA,

M.S.,

Shiroorkar

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 9 In this study, the aging process was applied to composite specimens before and after repair procedures were performed. 11 , 16 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5 Numerous in vitro studies utilizing different surface treatments and different adhesive systems and silanes have been reported previously. 3,7,[9][10][11][12] Unfortunately, universal evidence regarding the appropriate techniques and materials to be used is not available.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The comparison of the repair bond strength of the composite resin to direct and indirect composite restorations with different surface preparations

Bahadır

Polatoğlu

TUNCER

et al. 2023

J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Indirect restorations have been employed in restorative dentistry to solve some of the drawbacks of direct restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different modes of a universal adhesive resin on the repair capacity of two indirect resin composites and a direct resin composite. Methods. Indirect composite resins (Ceramage and Gradia Plus) and a direct composite resin (Filtek Z250) were prepared in a plastic mold with a height and diameter of 2-mm and 6-mm, respectively. Composite blocks were thermocycled (5000 cycles, 5°C-55°C). Then, according to their surface treatments, composite blocks were categorized into six-groups: Group 1: ER (etch&rinse), Group 2: SE (self-etch), Group 3: Bur+ER (bur+etch&rinse), Group 4: Bur+SE (bur+self-etch), Group 5: Bur+Silane+ER (bur+silane+etch&rinse), Group 6: Bur+Silane+SE (bur+silane+self-etch), respectively. After surface treatments and adhesive application for bonding with a direct resin composite, all groups were then thermocycled before performing shear-bond-strength-test. Failure modes were evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by two-way-ANOVA and Bonferroni-test (P<0.05). Results. The highest bond-strength values were obtained for Bur+Silane+SE groups, while the lowest values were obtained for the Bur+Silane+ER groups for all materials. Statistically significant differences were observed between the Bur+Silane+ER group and ER, Bur+ER and Bur+Silane+SE groups in Gradia Plus (P<0.05). Conclusion. The self-etch-mode of the universal-adhesive and silane applications led to the increase in the repair-strength of the adhesive in the Filtek Z250 and Ceramage. The self-etch-mode of the universal-adhesive might be used to reduce adhesive-application-steps in the clinical repair procedures.

show abstract

“…This new generation system, so‐called multi‐mode adhesive, offers physician options by way of its applicability with self‐etch, selective‐etch, and total‐etch techniques 32,33 . Multi‐mode adhesives have been introduced as universal adhesives due to their ability to bond enamel, dentin, composite, ceramic, and metal surfaces 34,35 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…32,33 Multi-mode adhesives have been introduced as universal adhesives due to their ability to bond enamel, dentin, composite, ceramic, and metal surfaces. 34,35 The composition of the adhesive itself directly influences repair success. 26,36,37 The main component of adhesive resins is functional monomers, such as 10-MDP, which is frequently used.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of different universal adhesives and surface treatments on repair bond strength between resin composites

Yilmaz

Yazkan

Siso

2022

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different universal adhesives and surface treatments on the repair bond strength between resin composites. Materials and Methods:A total of 220 composite samples were divided into three groups according to the adhesive resin to be applied: 1) Scotchbond Universal, 2) G-Premio Bond, and 3) Peak Universal Bond. They were then divided into seven subgroups according to surface treatments (n = 10): A) air abrasion, B) air abrasion+silane, C) hydrofluoric acid, D) hydrofluoric acid+silane, E) air abrasion+hydrofluoric acid+silane, F) silane, and G) no surface treatment (negative control). After surface treatment, a repair composite was applied. Samples aged in the thermocycle were subjected to micro-tensile bond strength testing.Cohesive strength values of 10 non-aged composite blocks were used as a positive control. Kruskal-Wallis and one-way ANOVA tests were used for statistical evaluation. Fractured surfaces were evaluated using a scanning electron microscope.Results: In Scotchbond Universal and G-Premio Bond, the mean micro-tensile bond strength value of the no surface treatment subgroup was significantly lower than that of the positive control. All subgroups of Peak Universal Bond showed similar values to the positive control. Conclusion:While Scotchbond Universal and G-Premio Bond required mechanical roughening before adhesive application, Peak Universal Bond did not require any surface treatment.

show abstract

Effect of different adhesive protocols on bond strength between composite resins for indirect use and repair materials

Cited by 7 publications

References 19 publications

Bond Strength of Low-Viscosity Bulk-Fill Composite and Adhesives Using 10-Methacryloyloxydecyl Dihydrogen Phosphate (10-Mdp)

Bond Strength of Low-Viscosity Bulk-Fill Composite and Adhesives Using 10-Methacryloyloxydecyl Dihydrogen Phosphate (10-Mdp)

The comparison of the repair bond strength of the composite resin to direct and indirect composite restorations with different surface preparations

Effects of different universal adhesives and surface treatments on repair bond strength between resin composites

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About