2020
DOI: 10.4236/aim.2020.103007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Different Concentrations of the Suspensions of <i>B. amyloliquefaciens</i> and <i>T. harzianum</i> on the Development of <i>C. acutatum</i>

Abstract: The effect of nine isolates of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and one strain of Trichoderma harzianum, TR, on mycelial growth and germination of Colletotrichum acutatum were studied. The nine isolates were identified as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. The efficacy of isolates was tested, at different concentrations. Results showed that one Bacillus isolates (Bc2) and TR were more effective at the lower concentration tested (3 × 10 5 CFU/ml and 10 5 conidia/ml).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All samples tested were performed in fourplicate and the results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The percentage of the inhibitory activity (E) was calculated relative to the control as reported by Es‐Soufi et al [53] As an initial attempt, hybrid compounds of Series 1 were tested for their antifungal activity against the selected strain at c = 25 μM and, no inhibitory activity was observed, (E < 0 for 7a and 7b , and E < 0.3 for 5b ). In contrast, all compounds of Series 2 ( 10a–10e ) exhibit antifungal activities, the results are collected in Table S3 in Supporting Information, and the in vitro antifungal activity profile is shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All samples tested were performed in fourplicate and the results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The percentage of the inhibitory activity (E) was calculated relative to the control as reported by Es‐Soufi et al [53] As an initial attempt, hybrid compounds of Series 1 were tested for their antifungal activity against the selected strain at c = 25 μM and, no inhibitory activity was observed, (E < 0 for 7a and 7b , and E < 0.3 for 5b ). In contrast, all compounds of Series 2 ( 10a–10e ) exhibit antifungal activities, the results are collected in Table S3 in Supporting Information, and the in vitro antifungal activity profile is shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%