2015
DOI: 10.3923/ajas.2015.225.232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Different Feed Combinations on the Growth Performance of Cross-Bred Heifer Calves

Abstract: This study was conducted to evaluate the growth performance and feed intake of crossbred (Holstein Friesian×Sahiwal) kg at 4 months of age. The calves were assigned into treatments having, T 1 = Control (Farm ration), T 2 = 50% Barley+30% MC+0% AC+8% WB 2% MM, T3 = 50% Maize+30% MC+10% AC+8% WB 2% MM, T 4 = 50% Sorghum+30% MC+10% AC+8% WB 2% MM, using randomized complete block design into four blocks of six animals. The total DM and DMI (% of body weight) intake for T 3 and T 2 diets were higher (p<0.05) tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This higher body growth in heifer could be narrated due to addition of protein rich ingredients in the concentrate mixer which supported by Strzetelski et al (2007) who mentioned that increasing dietary energy and protein in the ration of heifer improve WH. Again, highest HG recorded in crossbred heifer by Singh et al (2015) through feeding concentrate based diet. Time greatly influences on BWG, BLG and HGG of the heifers but the interaction effect of time and diet showed non-significant response on WHG and HGG (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This higher body growth in heifer could be narrated due to addition of protein rich ingredients in the concentrate mixer which supported by Strzetelski et al (2007) who mentioned that increasing dietary energy and protein in the ration of heifer improve WH. Again, highest HG recorded in crossbred heifer by Singh et al (2015) through feeding concentrate based diet. Time greatly influences on BWG, BLG and HGG of the heifers but the interaction effect of time and diet showed non-significant response on WHG and HGG (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%