2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Different Final Irrigation Methods on the Removal of Calcium Hydroxide from an Artificial Standardized Groove in the Apical Third of Root Canals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
106
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
106
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding was in accordance with previous studies that compared needle irrigation with passive ultrasonic irrigation [16][17][18] . It has been reported that the removal of organic and inorganic debris from the root canal walls is improved by irrigation with passive ultrasonic agitation 19,20 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This finding was in accordance with previous studies that compared needle irrigation with passive ultrasonic irrigation [16][17][18] . It has been reported that the removal of organic and inorganic debris from the root canal walls is improved by irrigation with passive ultrasonic agitation 19,20 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It can be suggested that the influence of CH in the penetration of AH Plus could be more apparent in middle third, since the apical third has less dentinal tubules The lower sealer penetration in the apical third is also attributed to the ineffective delivery of irrigants and the reduced effectiveness of smear layer removal techniques in the apical region. CH removal is more difficult in the apical third; despite this, it interestingly did not have a role in the tubular penetration of both sealers in the 3-mm level segments (4,21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Despite various proposed techniques, no technique thoroughly removes the CH dressing (4,21). The conventional syringe irrigation was used to remove the CH dressing before obturation procedures because this method does not require special devices, since the syringe is already used in root canal treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ancak bu sonuçlardan farklı olarak, Çapar ve ark. 22 EndoVac'ın Ca(OH) 2 uzaklaştırmada yetersiz olduğunu belirtmişler ve bunun sebebi olarak kanal içine yerleştirilen mikrokanüller üzerindeki deliklerin tıkan-masını göstermişlerdir. Bu çalışmada da aynı problem gözlenmiş olmasına rağmen, bu durumun elde edilen sonuçları etkilemediği görülmüştür.…”
Section: Bulgularunclassified