2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40798-019-0223-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Different Physical Training Forms on Change of Direction Ability: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract: BackgroundThe ability to perform a rapid change of direction (COD) is a critical skill in numerous court- and field-based sports. The aim of this review is to investigate the effect of different physical training forms on COD performance.MethodsA systematic review of the literature was undertaken using the following databases: PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar. Studies were eligible if they met the following criteria: (1) a COD test measuring performance before and after the training intervention, with sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
74
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(258 reference statements)
6
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, there was a large statistically significant relationship between COD deficits between angles (90 • -COD DEF vs. 135 • -COD DEF ), while it was not the case for COD test (90 • -COD vs. 135 • -COD). The rationale for that results may be similar mechanical requirement between COD angles suggested by the Falch et al [12] and Bourgeuis et al [13], that angles below 90 • are more velocity-oriented, while angles above 90 • are more force-oriented. These data provides further support for the use of a COD deficit to evaluate an athlete's COD ability, as it removes the influence of linear running speed on such tests.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Furthermore, there was a large statistically significant relationship between COD deficits between angles (90 • -COD DEF vs. 135 • -COD DEF ), while it was not the case for COD test (90 • -COD vs. 135 • -COD). The rationale for that results may be similar mechanical requirement between COD angles suggested by the Falch et al [12] and Bourgeuis et al [13], that angles below 90 • are more velocity-oriented, while angles above 90 • are more force-oriented. These data provides further support for the use of a COD deficit to evaluate an athlete's COD ability, as it removes the influence of linear running speed on such tests.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Plyometric training is thought to share similarities with COD due to the objective of exerting maximal amount of force in a restricted time period, producing as much power as possible [36]. In addition, utilization of the stretch-shortening cycle in fast dynamic exercises such as the COD and plyometrics is thought to be similar in terms of the ability to change a muscle contraction from eccentric to concentric as rapidly as possible [11,36]. As such, training with different countermovement jumps has been utilized in several training interventions [20,35,[37][38][39][40][41], inducing very small to very large effects [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, training with different countermovement jumps has been utilized in several training interventions [20,35,[37][38][39][40][41], inducing very small to very large effects [42]. The inconsistency in effects of the plyometric training interventions may be due to the lack of specificity towards the chosen COD test for performance measurements, as suggested in a review by Falch; Raedergård; van den Tillaar [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plyometric training often includes drop jumps [23][24][25][26][27] and/or countermovement jumps [28][29][30][31][32][33] with variations in ground reaction forces produced. The effect of the different training interventions varies, but failing to induce large and significant effects is often due to a lack of specificity in movement patterns between the chosen exercises and the test selected for measuring COD performance [34]. Often neglected is the task specific nature of COD ability [35], dependent on number of turns, angle of direction change and sprint distance covered [10,34,36,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%