2004
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.025064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Different Sample Types and Stability after Blood Collection of N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide as Measured with Roche Elecsys System

Abstract: any immunoassay, with or without an extraction and a purification step, requires validation by a definitive or reference method before being considered a gold standard (2 ).We have not made an arbitrary statement that extraction/chromatography RIAs for testosterone do not work. Our point is that there are no convincing data showing that they do work. The only existing reports, from two independent sources (1, 5 ), that compared extraction/ chromatography RIA with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry show that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples are also stable for at least 1 year when stored at Ϫ80°C, and five freeze-thaw cycles had no effect on analyte concentration (36 ). For the Roche assay, a small but statistically significant difference in results between heparin plasma and serum was shown in one study (37 ), but was not confirmed in others (35 ). EDTA plasma gave a consistent negative bias (6 -10% on average) compared with matched serum and heparin-plasma samples, although the studies did not indicate the variability among samples (38 ).…”
Section: Preanalytical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Samples are also stable for at least 1 year when stored at Ϫ80°C, and five freeze-thaw cycles had no effect on analyte concentration (36 ). For the Roche assay, a small but statistically significant difference in results between heparin plasma and serum was shown in one study (37 ), but was not confirmed in others (35 ). EDTA plasma gave a consistent negative bias (6 -10% on average) compared with matched serum and heparin-plasma samples, although the studies did not indicate the variability among samples (38 ).…”
Section: Preanalytical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…NT-proBNP in serum samples from month 0 were analysed centrally using the Roche Elecsys® kit, an electrochemiluminescence ‘sandwich' immunoassay based on polyclonal antibodies against NT-proBNP [20]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These peptides arestableandcaneasilybedetectedandquantifiedbyimmunometricassaysinserumorplasma.ThemolecularweightoftheseB-typenatriuretic peptidesdiffers,andbecauseNT-pro-BNPisnotclearedactively,ithasa longerhalf-life,withplasmalevels2-10timeshigherthanBNP [13].Both BNP and NT-pro-BNP levels were measured in all cases. Plasma BNP concentrations were measured with a specific immunoradiometric assay for human BNP using a commercially available kit (Shionogi, Osaka, Japan) and the BNP AxSYM kit (Abbott Inc., Abbott Park, IL, USA), asandwich-typeimmunoassaybasedon2monoclonalantibodies [14,15]. NT-pro-BNPlevelsweremeasuredinasinglebatchafterthefrozenspecimenswerethawed [13][14][15]usinganautomatednon-competitiveimmunoradiometric assay (Roche Diagnostics Inc., Mannheim, Germany) on an Elecsys1010analyser(RocheDiagnosticsInc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma BNP concentrations were measured with a specific immunoradiometric assay for human BNP using a commercially available kit (Shionogi, Osaka, Japan) and the BNP AxSYM kit (Abbott Inc., Abbott Park, IL, USA), asandwich-typeimmunoassaybasedon2monoclonalantibodies [14,15]. NT-pro-BNPlevelsweremeasuredinasinglebatchafterthefrozenspecimenswerethawed [13][14][15]usinganautomatednon-competitiveimmunoradiometric assay (Roche Diagnostics Inc., Mannheim, Germany) on an Elecsys1010analyser(RocheDiagnosticsInc. ).TheRocheNT-pro-BNP assay combines a capture antibody targeting pro-BNP amino acids 1-21 withadetectionantibodyrecognizingpro-BNPaminoacids39-50.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%