Effect of different sport environments on proactive and reactive motor inhibition: A study on open- and closed-skilled athletes via mouse-tracking procedure

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of different sport environments (open-and closed-skill sports) on proactive and reactive inhibitory processes as two distinct components of motor inhibition. A mouse-tracking procedure was employed to compare behavioral performance among three groups of participants (tennis players, swimmers and non-athletes) in non-sport-specific cued Go/No-Go (GNG) and Stop Signal Task (SST), which mainly engage proactive and reactive inhibitory control, respectively. Reaction times (RTs), inhibitory failures, and Stop Signal Reaction Times (SSRTs) were measured. To investigate dynamic aspects of inhibitory control, movement trajectories classified as one-shot (absence of trajectory alteration reflected in a steep slope) or non-one-shot (non-linear/multipeaked trajectory, with one or multiple corrections) were analyzed and compared among groups. Results showed no group differences in RTs in Go/No-Go and Stop conditions. SSRTs were significant shorter for the athletes than non-athletes in SST, but no differences emerged for inhibitory failures in cued GNG. During inhibitory failures athletes showed higher proportion of non-one-shot movements than non-athletes. Higher proportion of non-one-shot profiles was observed in cued GNG compared to SST. Finally, no differences between open-and closed-skilled athletes were found in both tasks. Our findings suggest that both proactive and reactive inhibitory controls do benefit from sport practice, but open-and closed-skill sports do not differ in influencing inhibitory processes. Movement profile analysis could be a promising, complementary behavioral analysis to integrate for more fine-grained evaluation and differentiation of inhibitory motor control in athletes, specifically when using GNG tasks.

Interplay among Anxiety, Digital Environmental Exposure, and Cognitive Control: Implications of Natural Settings

“…This task was initially validated by the seminal studies of Donders (see [67]) and has been extensively replicated over time. We applied a version similar to other works published by our group [65,68,69]. Briefly, the visual targets were white arrows presented on a gray background at the center of a touch-screen monitor.…”

Acute effect of complexity in basketball on cognitive capacity

“…In the broad range of definitions related to higher cognition, executive functions are identified as a group of capacities crucial for conscious and directed behavior control toward achieving specific goals (Diamond, 2013). These functions are essential for overcoming cognitive challenges in sports environments by facilitating the coordination between thought and action to achieve adaptive goals (Bravi et al, 2022). The study of the interaction between sports practice and cognitive functions promises not only to identify and enhance athletic talent (Scharfen and Memmert, 2019), but also to evaluate specific sports as potential interventions to enhance cognitive abilities in individuals with cognitive impairments, benefiting both young people and older adults (Tsai, 2009).…”

Stop it! Relationship between sport expertise and response inhibition in elite athletes

“…Especially in elite sports, being able to inhibit a movement at a late time seems beneficial, because of very dynamic and fast-changing playing situations as well as time-critical movements. In this vein, some studies have examined whether elite athletes perform better on cognitive tasks (Mann et al, 2007 ; Voss et al, 2010 ; Heppe et al, 2016 ) and in a response-inhibition task compared to non-athletes (Zhang et al, 2015 ; Brevers et al, 2018 ; Bravi et al, 2022 ) and recreational athletes. Most studies showed that elite athletes perform better in a response inhibition task than recreational athletes.…”