2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of different surface treatments on the micro tensile bond strength to dentin, biaxial flexural strength and roughness of CAD/CAM resin composite and polymer infiltrated ceramic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four studies that assessed PICN or/and DF-RCB materials were included in a meta-analysis [25] , [43] , [58] , [44] . As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four studies that assessed PICN or/and DF-RCB materials were included in a meta-analysis [25] , [43] , [58] , [44] . As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies compared FFL between groups etched with SECP and HF [44] , [42] , [35] . When HF acid etching was compared with SECP, there was no significant difference in the flexural strength (p = 0.34) ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the groups, the bond strength was strongest in the sandblasted and silane group. Sandblasting followed by silanization produced the maximum μTBS for resin ceramic, according to Pinto RDS et al(2022) 21 . study conducted by Huang B et al (2013) 22 found that combining bur abrasion with silanization, as opposed to just using bur abrasion, improved the binding strength between composites and ceramics based on lithium disilicate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%