2020
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Digital Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparative Study of More than 8 Million Korean Women

Abstract: M any studies have demonstrated that the performance of digital mammography is at least equal to that of film-based mammography (1-13), which has demonstrated a reduction in breast cancer mortality in multiple randomized trials. A few comparative studies have reported that digital mammography is more accurate than screenfilm mammography (SFM) (1,2). However, those studies had various limitations, and the results were valid only in certain conditions. First, they regarded two different systems-offline computed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed the cancer prevalence at 3.21 per 1,000 examinations [ 15 ]. With projection of the assumed cancer prevalence to the previous results, the target sample size was chosen as 32,714 participants, corresponding to approximately 16,000 participants per year.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed the cancer prevalence at 3.21 per 1,000 examinations [ 15 ]. With projection of the assumed cancer prevalence to the previous results, the target sample size was chosen as 32,714 participants, corresponding to approximately 16,000 participants per year.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in the case of patients under 50 years of age, the sensitivity of SFM was 49.0% to 53.7% and the specificity was 86.0% to 86.2%. In the case of FFDM, the sensitivity in women under the age of 50 was 54.6% to 54.5% and the specificity was 85.3% to 86.0%, which was better than SFM, but the sensitivity was still low [21]. These results show the importance of developing a new auxiliary diagnostic method that can improve the sensitivity of mammography and are considered important reference material for evaluating the significance of the results of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In developed countries, organized and opportunistic screening programs have significantly reduced breast cancer mortality. Although two-dimensional mammography uses a new detector, it is well known that it still has its limitations because the normal structures and pathological structures may overlap each other when obtaining the transmission X-ray image [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%